Bharat Express

Delhi High Court

During the hearing, Delhi Police told the court that the trial court did not follow proper procedure and the FIR contained sensitive details.

Parliament Security Breach case: Delhi Police moves Delhi High Court challenging trial court order directing it to provide FIR copy to accused Neelam Azad. Court allows urgent hearing and lists the matter for hearing today at 2:30PM.

The court declared that the Supreme Court's ruling on this matter is unambiguous

The Delhi High Court underscored the significance of preserving public spaces and asserted that bodies like MCD should not encroach upon them, emphasizing the adherence to the rule of law in the country.

Acknowledging the intricate nature of the surveying process, the central government estimated a timeline of two to three months to finalize surveys for the remaining properties.

The court, taking note of the protracted nature of the case spanning five years, has underscored that this represents the final opportunity for the central government to establish such a policy.

The court said that the purpose of imprisonment, even for the most serious crimes, is reformative and not retributive.

The court had stated that he had failed to prove the allegations of cruelty by the wife.

The order was passed on the petition of Delhi Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Harish Khurana.

Justice Tushar Rao Gedela emphasised that the State is required by the Constitution to protect its citizens.