Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In Nithari Massacre; Rejects CBI Appeal

In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court provided significant relief to Surendra Koli, an accused in the infamous Nithari killings, by rejecting the CBI’s appeal against his acquittal.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai dismissed appeals filed by the CBI and other parties, also rejecting the agency’s challenge against Moninder Singh Pandher’s acquittal.

Earlier, the Allahabad High Court had overturned the death sentences awarded to Koli in 12 cases and to Pandher in 2 cases.

The court observed that the prosecution failed to meet the standards of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, relying heavily on circumstantial evidence without corroborative proof.

The Nithari case, which shocked the nation between 2005 and 2006, centred around a series of gruesome crimes in Noida.

The CBI had charged Surendra Koli with murder, kidnapping, rape, and destruction of evidence, while Moninder Singh Pandher faced accusations including human trafficking.

Both convicts had challenged their death sentences in the Allahabad High Court, arguing that the lack of eyewitnesses and the reliance on scientific and circumstantial evidence undermined the fairness of their convictions.

The Missing Complaint

One of the key triggers in the investigation was a missing complaint filed on 7 May 2006.

A young woman from Nithari, allegedly lured by Pandher on the pretext of employment, never returned home, leading her father to lodge a case at Noida’s Sector 20 police station.

On 29 December 2006, police unearthed skeletal remains of 19 children and women in a drain behind Pandher’s bungalow in Nithari.

The horrifying discovery led to the arrest of both Pandher and his domestic help, Surendra Koli.

Subsequently, all cases related to the Nithari massacre were transferred to the CBI for investigation.

The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the importance of adhering to due legal process and the high standard of proof required in cases hinging on circumstantial evidence.

The verdict has reignited debates on investigative lapses and the need for forensic rigour in cases of such magnitude.

With the apex court upholding the High Court’s acquittal, the judgment is likely to set a benchmark for handling cases reliant on circumstantial evidence.

It also highlights the judiciary’s role in ensuring that convictions are based on conclusive proof rather than public sentiment or prosecutorial assumptions.

Also Read: Supreme Court Declines To Hear Lalu Prasad Yadav’s Plea In CBI’s Land-For-Jobs Case