India

Supreme Court Review Petition Challenges Decision On NEET-UG 2024 Exam

A review petition contests the Supreme Court’s recent ruling that denied a fresh NEET-UG 2024 exam.

The petition, submitted under Article 137 of the Constitution, disputes the court’s 23 July verdict, which concluded there was no systemic leak of the question paper that would undermine the integrity of the exam.

Insights

Review petitions typically address limited issues such as legal errors or apparent discrepancies in the record. They often resolve in chambers and rarely proceed to open court hearings.

In its detailed ruling, the bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud acknowledged the potential disruption a new exam could cause for over two million students who sat for the NEET-UG on 5 May.

Despite this, the court emphasized that its decision would not hinder actions against candidates who used fraudulent methods to gain admission.

The Supreme Court also expanded the scope of the High-Level Committee of Experts formed by the Centre to address the NEET-UG controversy.

The committee, led by Dr. K Radhakrishnan, former ISRO Chairman and IIT Kanpur Board of Governors Chairman, has tasked with developing a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for the exam’s administration.

This includes guidelines for registration timelines, exam center changes, and OMR sheet handling.

The committee’s findings are to be submitted to the Union Ministry of Education by 30 September.

The Ministry is likely to make decisions on the committee’s recommendations within a month of receiving the report.

Additionally, the Supreme Court criticized the National Testing Agency (NTA) for initially awarding compensatory marks to 1,563 students due to time loss, a decision later rescinded following multiple petitions.

The court has instructed the NTA to re-evaluate the marks based on the expert panel’s review of a controversial physics question.

This issue arose when 44 candidates received full marks due to NTA’s decision to accept two options as correct for the ambiguous question.

Also Read: Severe Flooding In Andhra Pradesh Claims 15 Lives; Impacts Over 4.48 Lakh People

Mankrit Kaur

Recent Posts

Devotees Mistakenly Collect AC Condensation As ‘Charan Amrit’ At Mathura Temple

Devotees at Mathura's Banke Bihari temple gathered to collect water dripping from a sculpted elephant,…

1 min ago

State Cannot Claim Private Property Under Article 39(b): Supreme Court

A nine-judge SC bench ruled that the State cannot indiscriminately seize private property for redistribution…

29 mins ago

RG Kar Case: Junior Doctors In West Bengal Protest Alleged Gaps In CBI Chargesheet

Junior doctors in WB protested Tuesday over alleged flaws in the CBI chargesheet on their…

55 mins ago

Supreme Court Upholds Uttar Pradesh Madrasa Education Act; Sets Limits On Higher Education Regulation

The SC upheld the UP Board of Madrasa Education Act, 2004, reversing the Allahabad High…

1 hour ago

How US Presidential Election Is Conducted – Explained

The US presidential election is a complex, multi-step process that involves both voters and an…

2 hours ago

Mumbai Police Uncover Connections & Weapons In Baba Siddiqui Murder Investigation

The Mumbai Police disclosed that the firearms used to assassinate late NCP leader Baba Siddiqui…

3 hours ago