One Nation, One Election
The Central Government has formed a committee under the chairmanship of former president Ram Nath Kovind to assess the viability of the simultaneous elections in India. The members of the committee are Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Congress MP Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury (Opted Out), former Rajya Sabha Leader of Opposition (LoP) Ghulam Nabi Azad, jurist Harish Salve, ex-CVC Sanjay Kothari, ex-chairman of Finance Commission NK Singh and former secretary general of Lok Sabha Subhash C Kashyap.
What is One Nation One Election?
“One Nation One Election” (ONOE) is a concept that has stirred considerable debate in the Indian political arena. It proposes synchronizing the electoral calendars of the Lok Sabha (the lower house of India’s Parliament) and the State Legislative Assemblies, with the objective of streamlining the electoral process. While this idea presents various potential advantages, its implementation also raises significant challenges and has sparked a broader discussion about the democratic fabric of India.
Proponents of ONOE argue that it could significantly enhance the efficiency of India’s electoral system and governance. The current system, characterized by staggered elections at different levels of government, often leads to a continuous cycle of political campaigns and electoral processes. Synchronizing elections would minimize these disruptions, allowing elected representatives and administrative bodies to focus on governance for more extended periods. This increased efficiency could lead to better policy formulation, improved service delivery, and faster infrastructure development – all crucial elements for India’s growth and progress.
Financial savings are another compelling aspect of ONOE. The cost of conducting elections in India is staggering, with substantial expenses incurred in campaigning, security, logistics, and administrative overhead. By reducing the frequency of elections, ONOE could lead to significant cost reductions. These financial resources could then be channelled towards development and welfare programs, addressing pressing issues like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
Voter fatigue and declining voter turnout are concerns in India’s current electoral system. Frequent elections can lead to voter exhaustion, diminishing the significance of each individual vote. ONOE could address this issue by making elections a less frequent but more significant event, rekindling voter enthusiasm and participation. Higher voter turnout is essential for a robust democracy, as it ensures a more representative government that is accountable to a broader spectrum of the population.
Synchronized elections can also contribute to political stability and policy continuity. The frequent changes in leadership at the state level often disrupt the implementation of long-term policies and projects. ONOE would provide more extended periods of governance, ensuring greater policy consistency and allowing for the successful execution of projects spanning multiple years. This stability is particularly vital in a country as vast and diverse as India.
Streamlining the administration of elections is another advantage of ONOE. Currently, managing multiple elections across the country demands extensive resources and coordination. Synchronizing elections would simplify the logistical challenges, allowing the Election Commission to allocate resources more efficiently and improve election management. This could lead to smoother and more transparent electoral processes.
One Nation One Election is a concept with the potential to reshape India’s electoral landscape and enhance governance efficiency. While it offers various advantages such as reduced expenditure, increased stability, and streamlined administration, its successful implementation requires overcoming significant constitutional, logistical, and political challenges. Striking the right balance between the benefits and complexities of ONOE will be crucial in shaping its future in Indian politics. The debate surrounding ONOE underscores the importance of democratic deliberation and consensus-building in a vibrant democracy like India.
The committee, led by former President Ram Nath Kovind, holds the promise of providing a comprehensive evaluation of simultaneous elections in India. Their expertise and impartiality offer a credible assessment, shedding light on the viability of this reform, addressing challenges, and potentially guiding India’s electoral future.
