Bharat Express

Supreme Court

Chief Justice Chandrachud emphasized that bribery does not fall under parliamentary privileges and that the interpretation of the 1998 verdict contradicts constitutional articles 105 and 194.

The seven-judge bench is reviewing the decision made by a five-judge bench of the apex court in 1998, granting MPs and MLAs immunity from prosecution for accepting bribes in exchange for speeches or votes in the legislature, in the JMM bribery case.

Asaram's attorney requested for bail, claiming that his client, who is over 80 years old and afflicted with terrible illnesses, has been imprisoned for the previous nine years.

The Supreme Court will be hearing the plea of the Gyanvapi mosque committee challenging Allahabad High Court ruling on the viability of lawsuits aiming to "restore" a temple.

In quick succession after receiving the judgment from the high court, the LDA started demolishing the shops and other commercial buildings on Ayodhya Road in Akbar Nagar.

2011 saw the Court acknowledge these divergent schools of thought and assign the case to a nine-judge panel.

The Indian Medical Association (IMA) cited several advertisements that purportedly painted allopathy and its practitioners in a negative light.

The Mamta government claimed in the Supreme Court petition that the CBI's authorization to register cases and look into state affairs had been revoked many years prior.

The "patriarchal" mentality that opposed the enlistment of women in the force had been questioned by the court.

The High Court, in its judgment dated February 5, emphasized that reposting alleged libelous content would fall under defamation law.