Bharat Express

Supreme Court

As the legal battle unfolds, it raises broader questions about the limits of political discourse and the legal mechanisms to address contentious statements.

A bench comprising Justices PS Narasimha and Aravind Kumar stated that interference with the High Court's decision to grant bail was unwarranted.

The court's intervention follows its earlier directives on February 8th and March 4th, 2024, expressing displeasure over DDA's defiance of court orders.

The petition underscores the urgency of addressing the alleged violations, emphasizing the Election Commission's responsibility to enforce the Model Code of Conduct rigorously. Despite

Forest officials are intensifying firefighting efforts across affected regions, including Haldwani, Nainital, and Champawat forest divisions.

Overall, the Supreme Court's intervention has temporarily halted the implementation of the High Court's order, providing a reprieve for the affected individuals and highlighting the broader issues surrounding the appointment process in public institutions.

A notice has been issued to Indian Medical Association President Ashokan, with a deadline to file a reply by May 14. The court will reconvene on the matter on this date.

The Supreme Court said that the only issue is why you did not interrogate Kejriwal in the beginning and why were you delaying.

Expanding the case's scope, the Supreme Court directed all Indian state governments to clarify their policies regarding history sheets on criminals.

Representing the petitioner, senior advocate Hufeza Ahmadi argued that the Army's failure to comply with the court's orders constituted contempt.