Legal

Supreme Court To Deliver Verdict On Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Today

On Monday, a Supreme Court Bench, led by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai, is likely to announce its verdict on a stay of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

Petitioners have strongly criticised the legislation, while the Union government maintains that it aims to prevent the misuse of Waqf properties and ensure greater transparency in their management.

The Bench, which includes Justice AG Masih, concluded hearings on 22 May after three sessions of arguments from both the petitioners and the government, and reserved its order thereafter.

Several parties, including AIMIM MP Asaduddin Owaisi and Congress MP Mohammad Jawed, have challenged the validity of the amended Act, which received Presidential assent and came into effect on 5 April 2025.

Petitioners argue that the amendment is discriminatory and disproportionately impacts the Muslim community.

Arguments by Senior Advocates

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing the petitioners, criticised the amended law as ‘unconstitutional’ and ‘arbitrary’, highlighting a provision that permits suspension of a property’s Waqf status during ongoing investigations.

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for the petitioners, stressed the religious and social significance of Waqf in Muslim life.

“Waqf is not just a legal entity, but a spiritual and social institution deeply woven into the lives of Muslims,” Dhavan said, referencing prior Supreme Court rulings.

He further contended that no external authority or official should have the power to decide what qualifies as an essential religious practice.

On the other side, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, the government’s second-highest law officer, contended that Waqf is not inherently a religious practice.

He asserted that Waqf boards managing such properties perform secular and administrative roles.

The amendment modifies the Waqf Act, 1995, to regulate Waqf properties – religious endowments or assets dedicated solely for religious or charitable purposes under Islamic law.

On 17 April, a Bench headed by then CJI Sanjiv Khanna refrained from staying the Act after the Centre assured the Court that the disputed provisions would not be enforced temporarily.

Also Read: Bomb Scare Sparks Panic At Delhi High Court; Threat Turns Out To Be Hoax

Mankrit Kaur

Recent Posts

“A Surge of Emotion In The Ocean Of Sanatan Dharma,” Acharya Pramod Krishnam Meets Pandit Dhirendra Shastri

Posting a photo of the meeting on the social media platform X, Acharya Pramod Krishnam…

45 mins ago

Asian Geography Conference Champions Youth As Vanguards Of National Development

Colonel Mustafa urges youth to use geography actively for disaster management, policy, and national development.

3 hours ago

India Sends Record 111-Member Squad To Deaflympics 2025 In Tokyo

India names a record 111-member team for Deaflympics 2025, competing across 11 sports disciplines.

4 hours ago

PM Modi, Leaders Extend Birthday Wishes to Bharat Ratna LK Advani

PM Modi, Amit Shah, and leaders extend birthday wishes to Bharat Ratna LK Advani.

4 hours ago

Justice Vikram Nath Hails PM Modi’s Vision For Accessible & Technology-Driven Justice At NALSA Conference

Justice Vikram Nath praised PM Modi’s vision for inclusive, tech-driven justice and legal empowerment.

4 hours ago

Justice Surya Kant Calls For Empathetic Tech-Driven Legal Aid System At NALSA Conference

Justice Surya Kant urged empathetic, tech-driven legal aid reforms to make justice accessible and inclusive.

5 hours ago