Allahabad High Court Quashes Gang‑Rape Case After Settlement; Flags Surge In False Complaints

The Allahabad High Court has quashed criminal proceedings in a gang‑rape, robbery, and intimidation case after both the complainant and the three accused reached a written compromise.

Justice Gautam Chowdhary, delivering the order on a petition filed by Munish of Badaun and two co‑accused, ruled that the settlement justified closing the matter.

However, to underscore the gravity of abusing the criminal process, the court directed both sides to deposit ₹2,000 each with the High Court Legal Services Authority within three weeks.

Allahabad High Court warns of growing trend

While accepting the compromise, Justice Chowdhary expressed serious concern over an emerging pattern: individuals filing grave criminal charges, only to retract them later.

“The practice of lodging false cases and subsequently backing out is on the rise,” he observed, calling it a threat to the credibility of the justice system.

The court said it could not overlook such conduct and used the cost order as a deterrent.

Case background

The complainant had originally accused the petitioners of gang‑rape, robbery, and criminal intimidation, leading local police to register an FIR under stringent sections of the Indian Penal Code.

During the trial in the lower court, the parties informed the judge that they had resolved their differences outside the courtroom.

Seeking final relief, the accused approached the High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which empowers the court to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.

Costs aimed at preventing misuse of law

Justice Chowdhary noted that quashing criminal proceedings purely based on compromise, particularly in serious, non‑compoundable offences, requires courts to balance individual settlement with societal interest.

By imposing costs, the bench sent a signal that litigants cannot treat the justice system as a bargaining chip.

“Such penalties,” the order states, “act as a necessary check against frivolous litigation.”

Legal experts say the ruling highlights a dual challenge: protecting genuine victims while discouraging concocted allegations that waste judicial time and tarnish reputations.

The decision reinforces recent High Court observations across India that urge litigants to act responsibly, reminding them that fabricated or inflated accusations come at a price, even if ultimately withdrawn.

Also Read: Allahabad HC Directs UPPSC To Allow Petitioner A Scribe For PCS Main Exam