The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has started the process of the survey from early morning on Friday, August 4, after the Allahabad high court on Thursday, August 3, cleared the way for it. The survey’s goal is to determine whether the Gyanvapi Masjid in Varanasi was built over an earlier structure of a temple.
The group in charge of maintaining the mosque has since appealed the high court’s decision to the Supreme Court. Before the ASI began survey on the site, the Muslim side requested the Supreme Court to rule on their appeal.
Alok Tripathi, an additional director general at ASI, stated that the government organization would resume archaeological survey and scientific investigation on August 4 in accordance with the high court’s orders in a letter to the District Magistrate of Varanasi and the Varanasi Police Commissioner.
The Varanasi government was asked by the ASI official to grant the survey team access to the site and sufficient protection for their work and stay.
The parties engaged in the matter have received a copy of the ASI letter from the district administration.
On August 3, the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice (CJ), Pritinker Diwaker, dismissed the plea filed by the Gyanvapi mosque committee in opposition to the Varanasi District Judge’s July 21 order directing the ASI to assess the property.
Also read: Live Updates: Parliament Monsoon Session, Will the Rajya Sabha’s deadlock Regarding Manipur Be resolved?
The high court upheld the district judge’s order to have the ASI director conduct scientific research, surveys, or excavations at the location, which is settlement plot no. 9130, with the exception of the area (the ablution tank) that was sealed by the Supreme Court last year.
The district court had also instructed the ASI to carry out a thorough scientific assessment of the current construction using GPR Survey, excavation, dating method, and other cutting-edge techniques to determine whether it had been built over an earlier structure of the Hindu temple.
The four Hindu ladies had requested year-round access for worship in the Gyanvapi property in a lawsuit they had filed last year, and the court had granted their request.
According to the high court, there is “no reason to doubt” the ASI’s claims that “no damage is going to be caused to the property in question” during the archaeological survey.
Also read: Gyanvapi Mosque ASI Survey Begins Early Friday Morning , Mosque Side Approaches SC
The high court had requested assistance from the ASI on the topic during the sessions.
The ASI would undertake a survey, documentation, photography, detailed description, GPR survey, and full studies “without harming the existing structures,” according to an affidavit Tripathi later filed in court.
The ASI would carry out a thorough investigation in line with the law, compile a list of the antiquities discovered inside the building, conduct a thorough investigation, and carry out the exercise to determine the age and type of the construction.
The Archaeological study of India (ASI) is conducting a scientific survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque. The Supreme Court declined to stop the survey on Friday and made it clear that it will be conducted “without any excavation and damage to the structure.”
“The HC has recorded the statement of the ADG of ASI and ASG appearing for UOI that no excavation whatsoever will take place,” sadi CJI DY Chandrachud on Thursday.
“In this backdrop that the HC observed that since the dept of archaeology had expressed that no damage would be caused, survey could be carried out,” he added.
Supreme Court allows ASI survey of Gyanvapi mosque
Gyanvapi Mosque News: ‘State Supposed to be Non-Partisan in This Matter,’ Argues Muslim Side
“There was a statement made by the CM of UP in the matter. You are the state and you are supposed to be non-partisan in the suit and this was while the appeal was being heard by your lordships,” senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi appearing for the Muslim side argued before the court.
Why Should We Disrupt Interlocutory Order? SC Requests Muslim Party
This order is interlocutory. Why should we get involved at this point? We’ll keep open any additional criticisms you may have of the commissioner’s report. During the hearing, the SC court stated, “We’re not suggesting that it’s acceptable or should be relied upon; that can be argued.
Senior attorney Huzefa Ahmadi, who was representing the Muslim side, was informed by CJI DY Chandrachud that he couldn’t appeal every interlocutory order on the same grounds.
The Muslim side is contesting the Allahabad High Court’s ruling ordering the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to conduct a survey at the Gyanvapi complex in Varanasi before a bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud.
To read more such news, download Bharat Express news apps
