India

High Court: No Marriage Can Be Solemnized Between Parties Related To Each Other As ‘Sapinda’

The High Court has upheld the validity of Section 5(v) of the Hindu Marriage Act, which states that no marriage can be solemnized between parties related to each other as sapinda i.e. cousins unless, it be mentioned in the tradition followed by the citizens marrying each other

Woman’s appeal against court’s decision

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan Singh and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora said that if the choice of partner in marriage is left unregulated, incestuous relationships may be legitimized.

The court rejected a PIL filed by a woman seeking repeal of this provision. She had challenged the order of the Family Court declaring the marriage between her and her distant cousin as void as per the said provision. Her appeal was rejected by a coordination bench in October last year.

The bench said that the woman had failed to show any ground to challenge the prohibition contained in the impugned provision and had also failed to show any legal ground to challenge the restriction imposed therein. The court said that the petition neither identifies the basis of the said restriction imposed by the state nor gives any solid legal basis to challenge the said section.

Also Read: High Court Directed Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena To Hear Out Private Unaided School Before Taking Over The Management

Woman’s customs had no mention of the same

The bench refused to accept the woman’s argument that the impugned section is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as the exception is only for marriages between persons based on custom with the force of law, which requires stringent proof. It exists and it should exist.

The petitioner has been unable to prove the existence of the custom in the facts of her case and has relied on parental consent which cannot take the place of custom. Therefore, this Court does not find any merit in the challenge to Section 5(v) of the HMA Act in the present writ petition.

The bench said that we are of the considered opinion that no reasonable ground in law has been placed before this Court during the pleadings or arguments in the petition to challenge the said impugned provision. However, the bench said that the woman would be free to initiate appropriate legal proceedings against her former husband before the appropriate forum as per law.

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Gautam Adani Hails Puri Lifeguards As Unsung Heroes During Rath Yatra Visit

Gautam Adani, Chairman of the Adani Group, visited Puri in Odisha during the annual Rath…

8 hours ago

Acharya Pramod Krishnam Slams Congress Over ‘Internal Emergency’ Allegation

Acharya Pramod Krishnam, stirred political debate by claiming an 'internal emergency' still exists within the…

8 hours ago

MRM Meeting: Pledge for Global Peace, Green India, De-addiction & Democratic Integrity

Taking a crucial step toward positive transformation, social reform, and global peace, the Muslim Rashtriya…

9 hours ago

India To Host 2029 World Police & Fire Games; Amit Shah Hails Global Recognition

India has been chosen to host the prestigious 2029 World Police and Fire Games in…

9 hours ago

Seeing The Lord Among Devotees Is The Pinnacle Of Humility: Gautam Adani At Rath Yatra

Gautam Adani, along with his wife and Karan, participated in the Rath Yatra in Puri,…

11 hours ago

PM Modi Interacts With Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla Aboard The ISS

PM Narendra Modi interacted with Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla, the first Indian to reach the…

12 hours ago