World

India takes step against Israel: Voted in favour of UN resolution to withdraw from Golan Heights

India voted in favor of a draft resolution in the UNGA that conveyed the organization’s grave concerns about Israel’s refusal to leave the Syrian Golan. A portion of southwest Syria known as the Syrian Golan Heights was taken over by Israeli soldiers on June 5, 1967.

Voting on “The Syrian Golan”

On November 28, the 193-member UNGA had a vote on the draft resolution titled “The Syrian Golan” under the topic “The situation in the Middle East.” In a recorded vote, the resolution—which Egypt had proposed—was approved with 91 votes in favor, 8 votes against, and 62 abstentions.

Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, Malaysia, the Maldives, Nepal, Russia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, and the United Arab Emirates were among the countries that supported the resolution, except India. The U.K., Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States voted against it.

The resolution expressed great concern that, in defiance of pertinent Security Council and General Assembly resolutions, Israel has not left the Syrian Golan, which it has occupied since 1967.

Also Read: Hamas willing to swap all Israeli soldiers for all Palestinian prisoners

Israel failed on Security Council’s Resolution 497

The resolution declared that Israel failed to comply with Security Council resolution 497 (1981), which decided that “the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is null and void and without international legal effect.” The resolution on Tuesday also ruled that the Israeli decision from December 14, 1981, was completely invalid and had no legal standing. It demanded that Israel reverse its course.

The resolution further emphasized how unlawful Israeli settlement expansion and other actions in the Syrian Golan that have been in force since 1967 are.

In accordance with the pertinent Security Council resolutions, it demanded that Israel withdraw from all of the occupied Syrian Golan to the line of June 4, 1967. It also concluded that “the continued occupation of the Syrian Golan and its de facto annexation constitute a stumbling block in the way of achieving a just, comprehensive, and lasting peace in the region.” The resolution conveyed serious concerns about the suspension of the Syrian peace process and hoped that negotiations would quickly pick up where they left off.

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

India And Nigeria Strengthen Counter-Terrorism Cooperation In Second Strategic Dialogue

Doval and Ribadu held detailed talks on challenges linked to terrorism and radicalization, including those…

22 mins ago

Ola Electric’s Share Hits All-Time Low Of Rs 74 Ahead Of Q2 Results

Analysts predict that the stock could drop closer to the Rs 70 mark. Ola Electric…

1 hour ago

US Election: Voting Begins With First Ballots Cast In New Hampshire

This election is one of the most divisive in US history. Harris and Trump have…

2 hours ago

Waqf Bill: Opposition MPs Meet LS Speaker, Lodge Protest Against JPC Chairman Jagdambika Pal

Opposition members alleged that Pal calls JPC meetings without consulting them and restricts their opportunity…

2 hours ago

Delhi HC Rejects Khalid Saifi’s Plea To End Attempted Murder Case In 2020 Riots

The Delhi Police opposed Saifi’s bail, citing evidence from WhatsApp messages exchanged among the accused.…

3 hours ago

Maha Kumbh 2025: Uttar Pradesh Enhances Security With Face Recognition Cameras

To protect millions of devotees at Maha Kumbh, the UP govt is implementing advanced security…

3 hours ago