Bharat Express

Delhi High Court

The petition before the High Court was lodged by Masjid and Dargah Abdul Salam, situated in the Connaught Place area.

The petition highlights a lapse in complying with directives issued by the Supreme Court in 1991, mandating state and central governments to provide official residential accommodations to all judicial officers.

The court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Manish Goyal, noting that the petition was not maintainable.

The Delhi High Court has issued a summons against Tesla Power India Private Limited, a Gurugram-based company, and its US counterpart.

The backdrop of this directive lies within the context of ongoing PILs addressing the deteriorating air quality in Delhi. The court, taking suo motu cognizance of this pressing issue, has appointed an amicus curiae to assist in the proceedings.

The Chief Secretary of Delhi, the Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), the Veterinary Directorate, and the CEO of the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board have been summoned to the next hearing to discuss implementation strategies.

Advocates Charanjit Singh Bakshi and Amit Sahni, representing the Union Territory of Chandigarh, expressed concern that despite the High Court's directives, the case had not been expedited as required.

During the court proceedings, the Election Commission assured the Delhi High Court that it would take necessary measures to address the issue of deep fake videos.

Ashwini Upadhyay had said in the petition that the court should order the Central Government to set up a Legal Education Commission.

Karkardooma Court had framed charges against 11 people including former AAP councilor Tahir Hussain in the death case of IB constable Ankit Sharma during Delhi riots.