Legal

SC Slams Telangana CM Over Remarks On BRS MLAs’ Disqualification Case

The Supreme Court, on April 1, reprimanded Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy over his statement regarding the disqualification case of Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) MLAs.

Reddy had asserted that even if BRS MLAs joined the Congress, no by-elections would be held.

The court found this statement problematic, suggesting that it mocked the anti-defection law enshrined in the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution.

A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and AG Masih remarked that political statements made at public gatherings differ from those made in legislative assemblies, emphasizing that speeches in the House hold a certain sanctity.

The court also noted that political leaders must exercise caution while making statements that could undermine constitutional principles.

Judicial Concerns Over Legislative Delays

During the hearing, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing the Telangana government, refused to comment on the CM’s statement.

The bench then directed that the Chief Minister be warned against making such remarks.

The court reminded Rohatgi that he had represented Reddy in previous cases, reinforcing the need for accountability.

Earlier, the court had raised concerns over delays in deciding disqualification petitions.

The court questioned whether authorities should impose a fixed timeframe for resolving such cases, particularly before the Assembly’s term ends.

Justice Gavai warned that excessive delays could erode democratic principles, stating, “The outcome cannot always be that the operation is successful, but the patient dies.”

BRS Seeks Urgent Decision On Disqualification Petitions

The petitions before the court pertain to the Telangana Assembly Speaker’s delay in ruling on the disqualification of seven BRS MLAs accused of defection.

The BRS demands an expedited decision, emphasizing that the Speaker has delayed action for nine months since receiving the complaints.

The legislators facing disqualification include Srinivas Reddy Parigi, Bandla Krishna Mohan Reddy, Kale Yadaya, T Prakash Goud, A Gandhi, Gudem Mahipal Reddy, and M Sanjay Kumar.

The party contends that the Speaker’s inaction violates the principles of fair legislative conduct and democratic governance.

The Supreme Court’s observations underscore the tension between political maneuvering and legal accountability.

The delay in disqualification decisions raises critical questions about the effectiveness of anti-defection laws and the role of the Speaker in maintaining legislative integrity.

As the legal battle continues, the court’s stance reinforces the necessity of upholding constitutional values while ensuring that political leaders remain answerable to the law.

Also Read: Supreme Court Seeks Reply On Uttarakhand Madrasa Crackdown

Gopal Krishna

Recent Posts

Hina Khan Hails 11 Years Of PM Modi’s Leadership; Highlights National Progress

As the nation marks 11 years under PM Modi's leadership, actress Hina Khan shares her…

4 hours ago

Subhash Ghai Hails PM Modi’s Transformative Vision For India

Subhash Ghai has praised PM Narendra Modi’s leadership for catalysing India’s growth and changing the…

4 hours ago

India & Central Asia Boost Rare Earth Cooperation At Delhi Meet

India and five Central Asian nations have agreed to deepen cooperation on rare earths and…

5 hours ago

PM Modi’s Beej Se Bazaar Tak Vision Reshapes Indian Agriculture

Prime Minister Modi has redefined Indian agriculture with the ‘Beej Se Bazaar Tak’ vision, transforming…

5 hours ago

EV Sales Cross 4% Mark In May; Signalling Steady Shift To Green Mobility

EV sales topped 4% of passenger vehicle retail in May 2025, signalling growing demand for…

5 hours ago

Self-Reliant Defence Industry Marks India’s Strategic Security Ascent

One year into Modi 3.0, reforms have reduced poverty, strengthened defence, and accelerated the digital…

6 hours ago