Court To Hear Kapil Mishra’s Case On Offensive Statement On April 8

The Rouse Avenue Court will hear Delhi Law Minister Kapil Mishra’s case regarding his alleged objectionable statement made in 2020 on April 8.

The court will begin arguments on the charges against Mishra, who allegedly violated the Model Code of Conduct during the Delhi Assembly elections.

The court has instructed the Delhi Police to submit a detailed report on the allegations.

Mishra’s statement, made on social media on January 23, 2020, during the Delhi elections, allegedly sought to incite hate between religious communities.

Following the tweet, an election officer filed a complaint, and an FIR was registered against Mishra.

High Court Declines To Stay Proceedings

The Delhi High Court recently declined to stay the proceedings in the lower court.

The High Court clarified that there was no necessity to halt the trial, allowing the lower court to proceed with the case independently.

Additionally, the High Court directed the trial court to ignore comments from special judges and consider the case based on independent submissions.

Delhi Police’s Argument On Incitement Of Hatred

During the proceedings, the Delhi Police’s counsel argued that Mishra’s tweet aimed to foster animosity between two religious groups.

The counsel emphasized that two different courts had drawn similar conclusions on the matter, and they could evaluate Mishra’s defense when framing charges against him.

Mishra claimed in his defense that he did not intend to incite hatred but rather to express his political views.

He argued that the statement was not a violation of the Model Code of Conduct.

The case has drawn significant attention due to the nature of the statement and the implications it might have on political discourse in India.

The Rouse Avenue Court will now hear the charges on April 8, as the government awaits a decision regarding Mishra’s involvement in the case.

The matter highlights the ongoing tension surrounding free speech, political statements, and the consequences of such remarks during election periods.

Mishra’s defense, the Delhi Police’s arguments, and the court’s final verdict could set important precedents in handling cases related to political speech during elections.

Also Read: Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Petition On 33% Women’s Reservation In Rajya Sabha