India

MUDA Case: Siddaramaiah Challenges Governor’s Approval For Prosecution In Karnataka HC

Chief Minister Siddaramaiah filed a writ petition in the Karnataka High Court on Monday. He seeks to overturn Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot’s order allowing prosecution against him in the (Mysuru Urban Development Authority) MUDA case.

In his petition, Siddaramaiah alleges that the Governor’s decision is “legally unsustainable, procedurally flawed, and motivated by extraneous considerations.” He seeks to quash the order dated August 16, 2024, among other reliefs.

Siddaramaiah argues that the sanction was issued without proper consideration and violated statutory requirements and constitutional principles, including the advice of the Council of Ministers, which is binding under Article 163 of the Constitution of India.

The petition challenges the Governor’s approval under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. This sanction was based on a complaint lodged on July 18, 2024, by Respondent No. 3 with the Lokayukta Police in Mysuru. The complaint alleged irregularities in land allotment by MUDA concerning land in Sy. No. 464 of Kesare Village, Mysore.

Also Read: RG Kar Tragedy: Trinamool MP Seeks High Court Protection from Police Action

Following this, on July 26, 2024, complainant T.J. Abraham requested the Governor’s sanction for prosecution. On the same day, the Governor issued a show-cause notice to Siddaramaiah. Additionally, the Governor sent letters dated July 5 and July 15, 2024, to the Chief Secretary, who replied on July 26, refuting the allegations.

The matter was reviewed by the Council of Ministers, which, on August 1, 2024, advised the Governor to withdraw the notice and reject the sanction application. Siddaramaiah also submitted a detailed reply to the Governor’s notice on August 3. Despite this, the Governor granted the sanction on August 16, 2024, and communicated it to the Chief Secretary on August 17, 2024.

Siddaramaiah’s advocate, Shathabish Shivanna, stated that the writ petition names the State of Karnataka as the first respondent, the Special Secretary to the Governor as the second, and T.J. Abraham, Snehamayi Krishna, and Pradeep Kumar S.P. as the third, fourth, and fifth respondents, respectively.

The writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. It challenges the impugned order and seeks to quash it by issuing a writ of certiorari. The petition argues that the order violates the law, principles of natural justice, and established judicial precedents, necessitating judicial intervention.

Shibra Arshad

Recent Posts

SC Seeks Responses In Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi-Idgah Dispute, Grants Two Weeks To All Parties

The Supreme Court has also paused the Allahabad High Court’s order for a survey of…

1 second ago

Yogi Government Launches Massive Green Initiative For Maha Kumbh 2025

The Yogi Adityanath administration has launched a tree-planting campaign to make Prayagraj environmentally sustainable for…

18 mins ago

BJP MLA Rajeshwar Singh Calls On Akhilesh Yadav To Act As Positive Opposition In UP DGP Debate

Singh noted that, over seven years, police encounters have killed 197 criminals and injured 6,329.…

28 mins ago

Election Commission Appoints Sanjay Kumar Verma As New DGP For Maharashtra

The Election Commission of India endorsed the appointment of Sanjay Kumar Verma as the new…

58 mins ago

Devotees Mistakenly Collect AC Condensation As ‘Charan Amrit’ At Mathura Temple

Devotees at Mathura's Banke Bihari temple gathered to collect water dripping from a sculpted elephant,…

1 hour ago

State Cannot Claim Private Property Under Article 39(b): Supreme Court

A nine-judge SC bench ruled that the State cannot indiscriminately seize private property for redistribution…

2 hours ago