India

Delhi HC Eyes Imposing Costs as it Shifts Sandeep Kumar’s Plea against Arvind Kejriwal to Another Bench

The Delhi High Court expressed its inclination to impose “heavy costs” on the petitioner on Monday, as it moved a plea filed by former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MLA Sandeep Kumar, aiming to oust Arvind Kejriwal from his position as Delhi’s Chief Minister. This came following Kejriwal’s arrest by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in a money laundering case associated with the now-defunct excise policy, with the case transferred to a bench led by acting Chief Justice Manmohan.

Justice Subramonium Prasad’s bench transferred the matter after acknowledging that two similar pleas seeking comparable relief had been heard and dismissed by the said bench. The court is scheduled to resume hearing the case on April 10.

Justice Prasad remarked, “This is just for publicity.” He directed the petition to be listed before the bench chaired by the Acting Chief Justice, citing previous cases handled similarly.

Following the transfer, Justice Prasad commented, “I would have imposed heavy costs.”

In Kumar’s petition, he argued that Kejriwal’s arrest rendered him “incapacitated” to fulfill the duties of the Chief Minister as mandated by the Constitution. The petition contended that Kejriwal’s unavailability complicates the constitutional process, asserting that he cannot discharge his duties from prison in accordance with constitutional mandates.

Quoting Article 239AA(4) of the Constitution, the petition argued that without a free Chief Minister available to render advice, the mechanism outlined for the Council of Ministers aiding the Lieutenant Governor becomes impractical.

The petition sought a writ of quo warranto against Kejriwal, calling upon him to justify his authority to hold office and, subsequently, to remove him from office.

Kejriwal, arrested on March 21, is currently incarcerated in Tihar Jail.

The Delhi High Court had previously dismissed two public interest litigations seeking Kejriwal’s removal from office. A bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora declined to entertain a PIL on April 4, asserting that Kejriwal’s continuation as Chief Minister was his personal choice. Earlier, the same bench rejected a similar PIL, stating that there was no legal impediment preventing the arrested Chief Minister from holding office and that judicial intervention was unwarranted, leaving the matter to other state organs for consideration.

Also Read: ED Grills Arvind Kejriwal’s PA, Summons AAP MLA in Delhi Excise Policy Probe

Malika Sahni

Recent Posts

Delhi HC Rejects Khalid Saifi’s Plea To End Attempted Murder Case In 2020 Riots

The Delhi Police opposed Saifi’s bail, citing evidence from WhatsApp messages exchanged among the accused.…

26 mins ago

Maha Kumbh 2025: Uttar Pradesh Enhances Security With Face Recognition Cameras

To protect millions of devotees at Maha Kumbh, the UP govt is implementing advanced security…

32 mins ago

SBI CME Soldierathon Set To Honour Indian Army’s Brave Soldiers On 244th Sappers Day At CME Pune

This landmark event, organized at the historic Military Institute, will honor the sacrifices of the…

43 mins ago

SC Seeks Responses In Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi-Idgah Dispute, Grants Two Weeks To All Parties

The Supreme Court has also paused the Allahabad High Court’s order for a survey of…

55 mins ago

Yogi Government Launches Massive Green Initiative For Maha Kumbh 2025

The Yogi Adityanath administration has launched a tree-planting campaign to make Prayagraj environmentally sustainable for…

1 hour ago

BJP MLA Rajeshwar Singh Calls On Akhilesh Yadav To Act As Positive Opposition In UP DGP Debate

Singh noted that, over seven years, police encounters have killed 197 criminals and injured 6,329.…

1 hour ago