Supreme Court Rejects Petition In Minor Girl Case; Upholds High Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court recently rejected a petition challenging the Allahabad High Court’s ruling in a case involving a minor girl.

The petition, filed by lawyer Anjali Patel, sought to overturn the High Court’s decision that classified certain actions as sexual harassment, not attempted rape.

Justice Bela Trivedi headed the bench that dismissed the petition, emphasizing that the court would not hear the case.

Controversial High Court Ruling

The Allahabad High Court had attracted significant attention for its controversial statement regarding the actions of two accused individuals, Pawan and Akash, from the Kasganj district.

They were accused of molesting an 11-year-old girl, with allegations including grabbing her breasts and attempting to remove her clothing.

The High Court, however, ruled that these actions were not an attempt at rape, but rather constituted sexual harassment.

This decision had sparked public outcry, with many questioning the judicial handling of the case.

Court Remarks On The Petition

During the Supreme Court’s hearing, the petitioners attempted to bring in the ‘Beti Bachao, Beti Padhao’ campaign while advocating for a revision of the High Court’s ruling.

Justice Trivedi swiftly intervened, telling the lawyer not to lecture the court on the matter. She further stated that the Supreme Court would not entertain the case, upholding the previous judgment.

The Allahabad High Court’s judgment stated that the accused’s actions did not fall under the category of an attempt to commit rape (under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code), nor under Section 18 of the POCSO Act (attempted sexual assault).

Instead, the court applied Section 354B of the IPC, which deals with assault or use of force with the intent of disrobing or forcing a person into nudity, and Section 9(M) of the POCSO Act, which deals with harassment of minors.

The High Court’s ruling reduced the severity of the accusations, leading the petitioners to argue that the verdict could set a dangerous precedent for future sexual assault cases involving minors.

Timeline Of Events

The incident took place in 2021, when the accused, Pawan and Akash, allegedly attempted to molest the 11-year-old girl by offering her a lift and later pulling her towards a culvert.

However, they fled the scene when bystanders intervened.

The authorities initially registered the case under Section 376 (rape) and Section 18 (attempt to commit a sexual offense) of the POCSO Act.

However, the High Court reviewed the case and ruled that the accused’s actions were more appropriately categorized as sexual harassment.

The petitioners challenged this verdict in the Supreme Court, but the Court dismissed the petition after a brief hearing.

Conclusion & Future Legal Impact

The Supreme Court’s decision to reject the petition brings closure to the case, affirming the Allahabad High Court’s controversial stance on sexual assault and harassment.

However, it also underscores the ongoing debate about how sexual offenses, particularly those involving minors, are classified by the judiciary and the implications for victims seeking justice.

This case continues to highlight the challenges of defining and prosecuting sexual violence, especially in sensitive cases involving children, and raises important questions about how courts interpret and apply the law in such matters.

Also Read : Delhi: Senior Advocate N Hariharan Elected As President of HC Bar Association