Legal

Supreme Court Criticizes Advocate-On-Record’s Absence In Hearing

The Supreme Court, in a stern observation, raised concerns over the absence of an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) during a crucial hearing.

The bench, led by Justice Bela Trivedi, stressed the necessity of maintaining the court’s dignity, stating that the public looks up to the Supreme Court for justice.

The court made it clear that merely accepting an apology is insufficient and that legal proceedings must reach a proper and justified conclusion.

The issue arose when the bench objected to the absence of the AOR responsible for filing the petition.

The court expressed its dissatisfaction and remarked that High Courts and district courts often function more effectively than the Supreme Court in some cases.

When the Advocate-on-Record acknowledged the lapse, the bench firmly stated that there was no alternative but to accept responsibility.

Justice Trivedi emphasized that an apology alone would not be adequate.

SC Sets Guidelines For Court Presence

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that it would record only specific legal professionals in judgments moving forward.

Justice Trivedi’s bench specified that it would officially record senior advocates, Advocates-on-Record, and those physically present in court during arguments.

Additionally, it would also note the presence of a supporting counsel.

The court further stressed that appearances in the Supreme Court must strictly adhere to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

It also made it clear that every Vakalatnama (power of attorney) or memo of appearance carries responsibility and accountability.

SC Rejects Bar Association’s Argument

Rejecting arguments presented by the Supreme Court Bar Association and the Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association, the court affirmed that recorded appearances impact chamber allotment, participation in elections, and other professional privileges.

The court ruled that these aspects must be regulated to ensure discipline and accountability within the legal profession.

By taking a firm stance, the Supreme Court aims to reinforce professionalism and responsibility among legal practitioners, ensuring that court proceedings are conducted with the highest standards of accountability and respect for judicial integrity.

Also Read: Supreme Court Dismisses Tushar Gandhi’s Plea Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment

Gopal Krishna

Recent Posts

PM Modi Interacts With Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla Aboard The ISS

PM Narendra Modi interacted with Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla, the first Indian to reach the…

23 mins ago

Gautam Adani, Family Participate In Puri Rath Yatra; Launch Massive ‘Prasad Seva’ Initiative

Gautam Adani, along with his wife Priti Adani and son Karan Adani, joined thousands of…

1 hour ago

PM Modi, Leaders Pay Tribute To Former PM PV Narasimha Rao On Birth Anniversary

PM Narendra Modi on Saturday paid tribute to former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao on…

1 hour ago

Gautam Adani Hails Divine Experience At Rath Yatra; Praises Odisha’s Graceful Management

Gautam Adani conveyed profound spiritual emotions after witnessing the revered Rath Yatra of Lord Jagannath…

1 hour ago

Punjab’s Litchis Reach Middle East Markets In Boost To India’s Fruit Exports

In a step towards diversifying India’s horticultural exports, Punjab has successfully shipped its first consignment…

2 hours ago

Dalal Street Sees Strong Activity Of IPOs In June As Market Sentiment Improves

India’s primary market experienced a surge in activity in June 2025 as investor sentiment toward…

3 hours ago