Supreme Court Criticizes Advocate-On-Record’s Absence In Hearing

The Supreme Court, in a stern observation, raised concerns over the absence of an Advocate-on-Record (AOR) during a crucial hearing.

The bench, led by Justice Bela Trivedi, stressed the necessity of maintaining the court’s dignity, stating that the public looks up to the Supreme Court for justice.

The court made it clear that merely accepting an apology is insufficient and that legal proceedings must reach a proper and justified conclusion.

The issue arose when the bench objected to the absence of the AOR responsible for filing the petition.

The court expressed its dissatisfaction and remarked that High Courts and district courts often function more effectively than the Supreme Court in some cases.

When the Advocate-on-Record acknowledged the lapse, the bench firmly stated that there was no alternative but to accept responsibility.

Justice Trivedi emphasized that an apology alone would not be adequate.

SC Sets Guidelines For Court Presence

During the proceedings, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that it would record only specific legal professionals in judgments moving forward.

Justice Trivedi’s bench specified that it would officially record senior advocates, Advocates-on-Record, and those physically present in court during arguments.

Additionally, it would also note the presence of a supporting counsel.

The court further stressed that appearances in the Supreme Court must strictly adhere to the Supreme Court Rules, 2013.

It also made it clear that every Vakalatnama (power of attorney) or memo of appearance carries responsibility and accountability.

SC Rejects Bar Association’s Argument

Rejecting arguments presented by the Supreme Court Bar Association and the Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association, the court affirmed that recorded appearances impact chamber allotment, participation in elections, and other professional privileges.

The court ruled that these aspects must be regulated to ensure discipline and accountability within the legal profession.

By taking a firm stance, the Supreme Court aims to reinforce professionalism and responsibility among legal practitioners, ensuring that court proceedings are conducted with the highest standards of accountability and respect for judicial integrity.

Also Read: Supreme Court Dismisses Tushar Gandhi’s Plea Against Sabarmati Ashram Redevelopment