In a significant development, the Delhi High Court will hear a petition challenging the special court’s order to provide unverified documents related to an attack on Swati Maliwal by Bibhav Kumar, a close aide of former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal.
The case, which has attracted attention due to its political implications, continues to unfold as the legal process moves forward.
The case revolves around Bibhav Kumar, who stands accused of attacking Swati Maliwal, the Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women, prompting a broader investigation.
The Delhi Police have challenged a special court’s order that directed them to produce a list of unverified documents.
The police argue that these documents are insufficient to prove the validity of the claims, questioning their reliability for the ongoing investigation.
In this context, the Delhi High Court will evaluate the merit of the police’s petition and decide whether to uphold or modify the special court’s decision.
The hearing scheduled for March 25 will address these concerns, focusing on whether the court should admit unverified documents and, if so, how to handle their authenticity.
The case entered a crucial phase when the Delhi High Court decided to hear the police’s petition regarding the special court’s order.
On March 4, Justice Vikas Mahajan of the Delhi High Court conducted a brief hearing, instructing the police to file a concise note for consideration.
The case was then adjourned, and both parties were asked to present their arguments.
The development comes after the Supreme Court granted Bibhav Kumar bail in September 2022.
Kumar’s legal team is now focusing on challenging the special court’s directive, which requests unverified documents.
The order has sparked a legal debate regarding the admissibility of such documents in criminal investigations, raising questions about the evidence required to support criminal charges.
The case is significant as it will set a precedent regarding the treatment of unverified documents in high-profile cases.
If the Delhi High Court allows the use of unverified documents, it will set a precedent for similar cases in the future and influence how courts handle evidence and accept documents.
As the Delhi High Court prepares to hear the petition on March 25, legal experts are closely watching the case for its potential to shape standards on the admissibility of unverified documents in criminal cases.
The outcome will not only affect Bibhav Kumar but could also influence future legal proceedings involving high-profile individuals and politically sensitive cases in India.
The case continues to highlight the complexities of balancing legal rigor with the need for justice in politically charged scenarios.
Also Read: Rashid Engineer Challenges Court Decision: Seeks Bail To Attend Parliament Sessions
Jammu city plunged into darkness late Friday evening after a series of loud blasts echoed…
Daniel Pearl’s father reacted strongly to reports of Pakistani officials attending Azhar’s funeral. “I wish…
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday held a high-level meeting with Defence Minister Rajnath Singh,…
Pakistan in the beginning claimed to shoot down Indian drones. Then, they said drones were…
The biggest gains from privatisation are expected in rural and semi-urban areas, where electricity supply…
The cost of a 1 kW plant is ₹65,000. With ₹45,000 from the government and…