The Supreme Court may soon hear a petition challenging the proposed demolition actions in Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh. Filed by three victims, the petition seeks to halt the bulldozer operations initiated by local authorities.
The petition specifically demands the cancellation of notices issued by the Public Works Department (PWD) of Uttar Pradesh. It references statements from the local MLA, indicating that following a recent incident in Bahraich, the administration has placed demolition notices on the illegally constructed property of the primary accused, Abdul Hameed.
Also Read: Supreme Court Halts NCPCR Directive To Cease Funding For Madrasa Boards
Meanwhile, the Allahabad High Court has stayed a related petition filed by an NGO for 15 days. The PWD had previously issued notices to 23 individuals, requiring them to respond within three days. On Saturday, these notices were affixed to the properties of the accused, including Hameed, after being deemed illegal.
The Association for Protection of Rights has filed a petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking to annul these notices. The PWD claims that the constructions are illegal, and many of the property owners are also implicated in the recent violence.
The unrest in Bahraich began on October 13, when 22-year-old Ram Gopal Mishra was shot during a communal clash sparked by music played during a procession. Following this incident, the PWD issued demolition notices to 23 properties in the area, 20 of which are owned by Muslims. These actions were taken under the Road Control Act of 1964.
Bhat was arrested in October 2021 based on an NIA FIR, accusing him of supporting…
Local media footage showed smoke clouds and a large fire at the site in Kahramankazan,…
The bomb threats caused widespread panic, leading to flight diversions. Over 120 flights, including international…
The court granted Ashish Mishra bail under strict conditions. He must leave Uttar Pradesh within…
It best serves the fundamental interests of our two countries and two peoples for both…
Delhi LG stated that he was unaware of the requirement for the Supreme Court's permission…