India

Supreme Court Questions Amendment of Preamble: Can ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ Stay?

The Supreme Court has decided to examine whether the words “socialist” and “secular” could have been added to the Preamble of the Indian Constitution in 1976 without altering the original adoption date of November 26, 1949. This decision comes after hearing petitions seeking the deletion of these words from the Preamble. Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta clarified that while they’re not suggesting the Preamble cannot be amended, they are questioning whether such an amendment was permissible when the original adoption date was part of the Preamble.

The Preamble serves as an introduction to the Constitution, outlining its guiding principles. Originally adopted in 1949 and coming into effect in 1950, it emphasized principles such as justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity. The words “socialist” and “secular” were added in 1976 through the 42nd Constitution Amendment, which was controversial.

Also read: Rajya Sabha Passes Bills on OBC Reservation and SC, ST Modifications in Jammu & Kashmir

The petitions argue that this insertion goes against the original intent of the Constitution’s framers and violates fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, expression, and religion. They also challenge the insertion of these words in the Representation of People Act, arguing that it imposes ideological constraints on political parties.

The petitioners point out that previous attempts to include “secular” in the Constitution were rejected by the Constituent Assembly. They question whether Parliament had the authority to go against the Constituent Assembly’s decisions and amend the Preamble.

Also read: BJP Workers in Pune Attack Journalist Nikhil Wagle’s Car, Opposition Decries ‘Goonda Raj’

Subramanian Swamy, in his petition, contends that the Preamble is not equivalent to an ordinary statute and cannot be easily varied, altered, or repealed. He argues that the insertion of “socialist” and “secular” goes against the fundamental principles of the Constitution and the right to freedom of religion.

The Supreme Court has scheduled the next hearing for April and has asked the parties to prepare arguments regarding whether the Preamble could have been amended without altering the original adoption date. This case raises significant questions about the nature of constitutional amendments and the foundational principles of the Indian Constitution.

Srushti Sharma

Recent Posts

Counting Underway For 2024 Assembly Elections In Maharashtra & Jharkhand; Bypolls Across 15 States

The counting of votes for the 2024 Assembly Elections in Maharashtra and Jharkhand, alongside bypolls…

5 mins ago

Jharkhand Results 2024: Key Seats To Watch As BJP And JMM Brace For Battle

This election witnessed a record voter turnout of 67.74%, the highest since the state’s formation…

33 mins ago

Maharashtra Result 2024: 49 Assembly Seats To Decide ‘Real’ Shiv Sena

The competition is especially significant after the rebellion led by Eknath Shinde’s faction, which managed…

35 mins ago

Maharashtra Results 2024: Counting Of Votes Kicks Off With Tight Security

Counting begins at 8 AM with postal ballots, followed by EVM votes at 8:30 am…

36 mins ago

‘In Kabul, A Cat Has More Freedom Than A Woman’: Revisiting Women’s Struggles Under The Taliban

The Taliban’s regime has since imposed over 100 laws restricting women's rights, stripping them of…

11 hours ago

PM Modi’s Gifts: A Glimpse Of India’s Cultural Heritage In Global Diplomacy

These gifts to world leaders reflect the diverse traditions, arts, and crafts of India, emphasizing…

14 hours ago