India

Supreme Court Issues Landmark Ruling on Electoral Bonds Scheme Today

Today, the Supreme Court is set to deliver its verdict on a series of petitions challenging the legitimacy of the electoral bonds scheme. Led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, a five-judge Constitution bench, which reserved its verdict on November 2 last year, will address this pivotal issue. Introduced by the government on January 2, 2018, the electoral bonds scheme aimed to replace cash donations and enhance transparency in political funding.

Electoral bonds function as a financial tool enabling individuals and corporations to donate funds to political parties anonymously, safeguarding their identities. These bonds, available in denominations ranging from ₹1,000 to ₹1 crore, can be purchased by any citizen of India or entity incorporated within the country at State Bank of India (SBI) branches. Notably, these donations are interest-free.

Also Read: Australian Prime Minister Supports Parliamentary Motion Demanding Julian Assange’s Release

Anonymity is a key feature of electoral bonds. Donors’ identities remain undisclosed to the public and the receiving political party, although the government and the bank retain purchaser details for auditing purposes, ensuring funding legitimacy. Last year, ahead of the November hearing, Attorney General R Venkataramani argued that the Constitution doesn’t guarantee citizens an absolute right to information regarding the source of political funding via electoral bonds. He contended that the scheme promotes transparency and clean money in elections.

The electoral bonds scheme stipulates that only political parties registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and those securing at least 1 percent of the votes in the last Lok Sabha or state legislative assembly elections are eligible to receive these bonds. Furthermore, eligible political parties can only encash these bonds through a designated bank account, as specified in the notification.

Also Read: Mother of Kargil War Hero Captain Vikram Batra Passes Away at Age 77

In April 2019, the Supreme Court declined to stay the electoral bonds scheme, citing the need for a comprehensive hearing due to the “weighty issues” raised by the Centre and the Election Commission. The current Constitution bench, comprising Justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, commenced hearing arguments on October 31 last year. The petitions included those filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur, the Communist Party of India (Marxist), and the NGO Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR).

Naiteek Bhatt

Recent Posts

Pahalgam Terror Attack: Five Terrorists Identified; Including Three Pakistanis And Two Kashmiris

Authorities have identified five terrorists involved in the deadly Pahalgam attack, which left the region…

2 mins ago

PM Modi Observes Moment Of Silence For Pahalgam Terror Victims In Madhubani

PM Modi observed a moment of silence in Madhubani, Bihar, to honour the 28 victims…

23 mins ago

Former UK PM Rishi Sunak Leads International Condemnation After Pahalgam Terror Attack

Former UK PM Rishi Sunak condemned the 'barbaric attack' in Pahalgam on April 22, declaring,…

1 hour ago

One Soldier Killed In Udhampur Gunfight As Multiple Anti-Terror Operations Continue Across Jammu & Kashmir

A soldier lost his life on Thursday during a gunfight with terrorists in the Basantgarh…

1 hour ago

Gautam Gambhir Receives Death Threat; Files Police Complaint

India men’s cricket team head coach and former BJP MP Gautam Gambhir has lodged a…

2 hours ago

Pakistan Announces Missile Test As Tensions Rise With India After Pahalgam Attack

Tensions between India & Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack, with Pakistan announcing a…

2 hours ago