India

Supreme Court Defers Legalization Of Same-Sex Marriage To Parliament

Today, the Supreme Court made a significant ruling that, while falling short of legalizing marriage equality, emphasized that an individual’s right to enter into a union cannot be restricted based on sexual orientation. The five-judge bench delivered four separate judgments, with primary differences revolving around the question of adoption rights for queer couples.

The judges collectively called for the government to establish a committee to address practical concerns faced by same-sex couples, including issues like obtaining ration cards, pension, gratuity, and succession rights.

On the topic of adoption rights, the bench delivered a 3-2 judgment. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice SK Kaul recognized the right of queer couples to adopt, while Justice S Ravindra Bhat, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice Hima Kohli disagreed.

Chief Justice Chandrachud underscored the importance of choosing a life partner as an integral part of one’s life journey, stating that this right is fundamental to the right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. He emphasized that the right to enter into a union includes the right to choose one’s partner, and denying recognition of such unions amounts to discrimination against queer couples.

He also rejected the notion that queerness is an urban, elite concept, asserting that it is not limited to specific classes of society. Justice Kaul agreed with the need for anti-discrimination legislation and highlighted that same-sex relationships have been recognized throughout history for emotional fulfillment.

Justice Bhat, while acknowledging the non-urban and non-elite nature of queerness, disagreed with Chief Justice Chandrachud’s directions. He argued that it is the legislature’s responsibility to create a legal framework for queer couples, as there are numerous aspects to consider.

All judges agreed that the court should not attempt to amend the Special Marriage Act, as doing so would encroach on the legislative domain. The Supreme Court’s rulings did not legalize marriage equality but affirmed the rights of queer couples to form unions and, in a split decision, to adopt. The court stressed the importance of addressing discrimination and practical concerns faced by same-sex couples and called for legislative action in certain areas.

Priyanka Rai

Recent Posts

Waqf Bill: Opposition MPs Meet LS Speaker, Lodge Protest Against JPC Chairman Jagdambika Pal

Opposition members alleged that Pal calls JPC meetings without consulting them and restricts their opportunity…

16 mins ago

Delhi HC Rejects Khalid Saifi’s Plea To End Attempted Murder Case In 2020 Riots

The Delhi Police opposed Saifi’s bail, citing evidence from WhatsApp messages exchanged among the accused.…

1 hour ago

Maha Kumbh 2025: Uttar Pradesh Enhances Security With Face Recognition Cameras

To protect millions of devotees at Maha Kumbh, the UP govt is implementing advanced security…

1 hour ago

SBI CME Soldierathon Set To Honour Indian Army’s Brave Soldiers On 244th Sappers Day At CME Pune

This landmark event, organized at the historic Military Institute, will honor the sacrifices of the…

2 hours ago

SC Seeks Responses In Mathura Krishna Janmabhoomi-Idgah Dispute, Grants Two Weeks To All Parties

The Supreme Court has also paused the Allahabad High Court’s order for a survey of…

2 hours ago

Yogi Government Launches Massive Green Initiative For Maha Kumbh 2025

The Yogi Adityanath administration has launched a tree-planting campaign to make Prayagraj environmentally sustainable for…

2 hours ago