India

Supreme Court Defers Legalization Of Same-Sex Marriage To Parliament

Today, the Supreme Court made a significant ruling that, while falling short of legalizing marriage equality, emphasized that an individual’s right to enter into a union cannot be restricted based on sexual orientation. The five-judge bench delivered four separate judgments, with primary differences revolving around the question of adoption rights for queer couples.

The judges collectively called for the government to establish a committee to address practical concerns faced by same-sex couples, including issues like obtaining ration cards, pension, gratuity, and succession rights.

On the topic of adoption rights, the bench delivered a 3-2 judgment. Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice SK Kaul recognized the right of queer couples to adopt, while Justice S Ravindra Bhat, Justice PS Narasimha, and Justice Hima Kohli disagreed.

Chief Justice Chandrachud underscored the importance of choosing a life partner as an integral part of one’s life journey, stating that this right is fundamental to the right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. He emphasized that the right to enter into a union includes the right to choose one’s partner, and denying recognition of such unions amounts to discrimination against queer couples.

He also rejected the notion that queerness is an urban, elite concept, asserting that it is not limited to specific classes of society. Justice Kaul agreed with the need for anti-discrimination legislation and highlighted that same-sex relationships have been recognized throughout history for emotional fulfillment.

Justice Bhat, while acknowledging the non-urban and non-elite nature of queerness, disagreed with Chief Justice Chandrachud’s directions. He argued that it is the legislature’s responsibility to create a legal framework for queer couples, as there are numerous aspects to consider.

All judges agreed that the court should not attempt to amend the Special Marriage Act, as doing so would encroach on the legislative domain. The Supreme Court’s rulings did not legalize marriage equality but affirmed the rights of queer couples to form unions and, in a split decision, to adopt. The court stressed the importance of addressing discrimination and practical concerns faced by same-sex couples and called for legislative action in certain areas.

Priyanka Rai

Recent Posts

‘In Kabul, A Cat Has More Freedom Than A Woman’: Revisiting Women’s Struggles Under The Taliban

The Taliban’s regime has since imposed over 100 laws restricting women's rights, stripping them of…

2 hours ago

PM Modi’s Gifts: A Glimpse Of India’s Cultural Heritage In Global Diplomacy

These gifts to world leaders reflect the diverse traditions, arts, and crafts of India, emphasizing…

5 hours ago

Dr Rajeshwar Singh Calls For Bold Goals To Make India A Global Power By 2047

Dr Singh stressed the importance of reaching a GDP of $15 trillion by 2047 to…

5 hours ago

Gautam Adani Faces Indictment In US: Legal Expert Vijay Aggarwal Dismisses Immediate Repercussions

Criminal lawyer Vijay Aggarwal weighed in on the charges against Adani. He believes the indictment…

6 hours ago

Adani Group Stocks Recover As Sensex nd Nifty Post Gains

After a major sell-off earlier in the week, Adani Group stocks, led by Ambuja Cements…

7 hours ago

Sensex Soars 1,961 Points, Nifty Gains 557 In Broad-Based Market Rally

A sharp rally in financial stocks and encouraging US labor market data fueled the uptrend.…

7 hours ago