India

Striking Remark From Supreme Court: Article 370 Was Never Intended To Be Permanent

Supreme Court on Article 370: While conducting the hearing on the petition challenging the amendments made in Jammu and Kashmir, that is abrogation of article 370 and reorganization of the state into two Union Territories Justice DY Chandrachud picked up acts and made striking crystal clear remarks. The Chief Justice of India is currently presiding over the 5-judge constitution bench.

He referred to Article 1, a permanent feature of the Constitution of India in Article 370, and stated that it is “a clear indicator” that the Article giving J&K the special status was never supposed to be permanent.

Here’s what Supreme Court said on Article 370 abrogation

While the senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan was making submissions to the opposition, the CJI stated, “Article 1 is a permanent feature of the Constitution. What was the reason for Art 370(1) to contain a specific reference that Article 1 shall apply? Article 1 was in any case applicable. That’s an embedded part of the Constitution.”

The Chief Justice of India stated that while “we may apply the principle of surplusage” to typical legislative acts, “you would never attribute to the Constitution-makers any intent to use a surplusage, or something without meaning.”

Also Read: Rajasthan Minister Ashok Chandna Saluted ‘Chandrayaan-3 PASSENGERS’, Slammed For Bizarre Remark

Also Read: Former CM Mayawati: “BSP Will Contest Lok Sabha Elections SOLO in UP”

What about Article 1

Interpreted in this light, he said, “the reason why Article 1 is specifically referred to in Article 370 is that during that interim period when other provisions could be modified, they were very clear that Article 1 will not be modified, which is a clear indicator of the fact that Article 370 was never intended to be permanent.”

Sankaranarayanan said that the case is “effectively about whether a power exists, and whether the process for exercising that power is followed” before the bench, which also included Justices S K Kaul, Sanjeev Khanna, B R Gavai, and Surya Kant. According to him, Article 3 permits the conversion of a portion of a state into a UT. He claimed that there is a process to follow that was not done for J&K.

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Pakistan’s Digital Frontline: Jokes, Memes And Savage Self-Roasts

While tensions between India and Pakistan escalate post the tragic Pahalgam terror attack, something unexpected…

2 hours ago

Reliance Industries Q4 Net Profit Rises 6.4% As Retail And Digital Units Offset Energy Weakness

Reliance Industries delivered a strong Q4 FY25 performance, with Y-o-Y net profit rising 6.4% to…

2 hours ago

Yash Pratap Singh And Mehak Jaiswal Top UP Board Exams With Outstanding Scores

Yash Pratap Singh of Jalaun tops Class 10 with 97.83%, while Prayagraj’s Mehak Jaiswal secures…

2 hours ago

Yogi Adityanath Calls For Reforms To Make Madrasa Education Modern And Employment-Oriented

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on Friday emphasised the need for sweeping reforms in the madrasa…

3 hours ago

Tulsi Gabbard Backs India’s Hunt For Pahalgam Terror Attack Perpetrators

United States Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard on Friday expressed strong support for…

3 hours ago

World Leaders Head To Rome For funeral Of Pope Francis

Indian President Droupadi Murmu will also attend, representing India alongside Union Minister Kiren Rijiju, Minister…

4 hours ago