India

Striking Remark From Supreme Court: Article 370 Was Never Intended To Be Permanent

Supreme Court on Article 370: While conducting the hearing on the petition challenging the amendments made in Jammu and Kashmir, that is abrogation of article 370 and reorganization of the state into two Union Territories Justice DY Chandrachud picked up acts and made striking crystal clear remarks. The Chief Justice of India is currently presiding over the 5-judge constitution bench.

He referred to Article 1, a permanent feature of the Constitution of India in Article 370, and stated that it is “a clear indicator” that the Article giving J&K the special status was never supposed to be permanent.

Here’s what Supreme Court said on Article 370 abrogation

While the senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan was making submissions to the opposition, the CJI stated, “Article 1 is a permanent feature of the Constitution. What was the reason for Art 370(1) to contain a specific reference that Article 1 shall apply? Article 1 was in any case applicable. That’s an embedded part of the Constitution.”

The Chief Justice of India stated that while “we may apply the principle of surplusage” to typical legislative acts, “you would never attribute to the Constitution-makers any intent to use a surplusage, or something without meaning.”

Also Read: Rajasthan Minister Ashok Chandna Saluted ‘Chandrayaan-3 PASSENGERS’, Slammed For Bizarre Remark

Also Read: Former CM Mayawati: “BSP Will Contest Lok Sabha Elections SOLO in UP”

What about Article 1

Interpreted in this light, he said, “the reason why Article 1 is specifically referred to in Article 370 is that during that interim period when other provisions could be modified, they were very clear that Article 1 will not be modified, which is a clear indicator of the fact that Article 370 was never intended to be permanent.”

Sankaranarayanan said that the case is “effectively about whether a power exists, and whether the process for exercising that power is followed” before the bench, which also included Justices S K Kaul, Sanjeev Khanna, B R Gavai, and Surya Kant. According to him, Article 3 permits the conversion of a portion of a state into a UT. He claimed that there is a process to follow that was not done for J&K.

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

JP Nadda Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Match-Fixing’ Claims As ‘Desperation Of Losing’ Polls

Rahul Gandhi's opinion piece appeared in a national daily and sparked political uproar. Opposition parties…

11 hours ago

Poverty In India Reduced Via Tangible Boost In Household Living Standards, Incomes

In 2022–23, poverty under the revised $3.00 line stood at just 5.25 per cent in…

12 hours ago

Chhattisgarh: Seven Maoists Killed In Indravati National Park Operation

Five Maoists were killed in two separate encounters with security forces in Chhattisgarh’s Bijapur district,…

12 hours ago

Carney Invites Modi To G7 Summit, Highlights India’s Global Supply Chain Role

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the most populous country, with the fifth-largest economy, must…

13 hours ago

RBI Frontloads Rate Cuts To Boost Growth Amid Low Inflation: Crisil

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has frontloaded its rate cuts to support economic growth,…

13 hours ago

PM Modi Urges Global Action On Coastal Resilience At Nice Summit

PM Narendra Modi on Saturday called for urgent global action to build infrastructure that can…

13 hours ago