India

Rouse Avenue Court Denies Bail Extension For Businessman In Money Laundering Case

The Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday rejected a plea from businessman Amit Katyal, an accused in a suspected land-for-job money laundering case, seeking an extension of interim bail granted to him in February this year. Consequently, the court has directed Katyal to surrender before jail authorities by today.

Former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi and her two daughters have been charged by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the same case. However, the court has criticized the conduct of the ED for obtaining independent medical opinions on the health of the accused, considering it a breach of privacy and an overreach of the court’s authority.

Special Judge Vishal Gogne declined Katyal’s plea for an extension of interim bail, stating, “The plea of the accused for extension of interim bail is declined.” The court has instructed Katyal to surrender before the Superintendent of Central Jail by 5:00 pm on May 1, noting that he has been deemed fit for normal physical activity following surgery at Medanta Hospital and is in a recovered state of health.

While addressing the plea, the court questioned the ED’s conduct in recording statements from treating doctors at private hospitals without consulting the accused or seeking permission from the court. The judge cautioned against the misuse of stringent provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) and emphasized the right to privacy and data protection.

The court further mandated the Director of the ED to ensure that agency officers are well-versed in the legal provisions concerning privacy rights and medical regulations. Additionally, it stressed the need for medical practitioners to be equally aware of these legal nuances.

The court expressed concern over the sharing of the accused’s medical records with government hospitals and the verification of previous treatments with private hospitals without the accused’s consent or court permission. While acknowledging the court’s authority in matters related to the accused’s health, the judge criticized the ED’s overzealous approach and urged restraint in future actions.

The court emphasized adherence to established norms and respect for court orders, particularly when matters are under judicial consideration. It highlighted the importance of maintaining confidentiality and respecting privacy rights in legal proceedings.

Also Read: BJP Stands Firm On Reservation, Amit Shah Says ‘Even If One Member….’

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

JP Nadda Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Match-Fixing’ Claims As ‘Desperation Of Losing’ Polls

Rahul Gandhi's opinion piece appeared in a national daily and sparked political uproar. Opposition parties…

4 hours ago

Poverty In India Reduced Via Tangible Boost In Household Living Standards, Incomes

In 2022–23, poverty under the revised $3.00 line stood at just 5.25 per cent in…

4 hours ago

Chhattisgarh: Seven Maoists Killed In Indravati National Park Operation

Five Maoists were killed in two separate encounters with security forces in Chhattisgarh’s Bijapur district,…

5 hours ago

Carney Invites Modi To G7 Summit, Highlights India’s Global Supply Chain Role

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said the most populous country, with the fifth-largest economy, must…

5 hours ago

RBI Frontloads Rate Cuts To Boost Growth Amid Low Inflation: Crisil

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has frontloaded its rate cuts to support economic growth,…

6 hours ago

PM Modi Urges Global Action On Coastal Resilience At Nice Summit

PM Narendra Modi on Saturday called for urgent global action to build infrastructure that can…

6 hours ago