India

President Murmu Flags Judicial Overreach; Asks Can Timelines Be Imposed On Assent Of Bills

A month after the Supreme Court set timelines for the President and Governors to act on state Bills, President Droupadi Murmu has approached the top court for clarity. President Murmu invoked Article 143 of the Constitution, seeking its opinion on whether courts can impose deadlines on Governors for clearing Bills.

Under Article 143, the President may consult the Supreme Court on legal or public importance matters. Murmu questioned whether a Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 200. She also asked if a Governor’s discretion is justiciable, citing Article 361, which grants immunity to the President and Governors from court proceedings over their official actions.

The President further asked whether, in the absence of a specific timeline, the court can prescribe deadlines or a manner of exercising discretion under Article 201 of the Constitution.

In April, Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan resolved a standoff between Tamil Nadu’s DMK government and Governor RN Ravi. The bench called the Governor’s refusal to clear 10 Bills “illegal and arbitrary” and gave a three-month deadline for action on re-passed Bills.

The ruling stated that the President should consult the court on constitutional matters. It noted that while courts avoid political issues, they may intervene when a Bill threatens democratic principles or raises constitutional doubts.

Court Asserts Executive Cannot Judge Bill’s Validity

The court clarified that only constitutional courts can assess a Bill’s legality. The Union executive should not judge a Bill’s constitutionality and should refer legal doubts to the court under Article 143.

The court acknowledged its advisory opinions are non-binding. However, it said these opinions carry weight unless outweighed by policy grounds. If the President withholds assent against court advice, the decision must be backed by strong reasons.

The Supreme Court will now decide whether to form a Constitution bench or stand by the earlier two-judge ruling. This development comes as Chief Justice BR Gavai assumes office.

Also Read: Trump Says India Is Offering Us A Zero Tariff Trade Deal

Ajaypal Choudhary

Recent Posts

MyGov Launches Exciting Contests To Celebrate 11 Years Of Transformative Governance

Marking 11 years of transformative governance, citizen engagement platform MyGov has launched a series of…

11 mins ago

President Murmu And PM Modi Extend Eid Al-Adha Wishes, Call For Unity And Service

On Saturday, President Droupadi Murmu and PM Modi extended warm wishes to citizens on occasion…

51 mins ago

JD Vance Resignation Claim Is False; Confirms No Credible Source

Viral claims about US Vice President JD Vance resigning due to tensions between Donald Trump…

1 hour ago

Vikrant Massey Shares Adorable ‘Monkey Business’ Moment With Son In Naples

Actor Vikrant Massey, currently enjoying a family holiday in Naples, Italy, delighted fans by sharing…

2 hours ago

Trending: Eid Al-Adha 2025: The Festival Of Sacrifice Brings Communities Together

Eid al-Adha, also known as Bakri Eid or the festival of sacrifice, stands as one…

2 hours ago

Overcoming Procrastination: Strategies That Help

Discover practical strategies to overcome procrastination, improve focus, and build habits that drive consistent productivity.

3 hours ago