India

Electoral Bonds Case, SBI on Notice: Here’s What Supreme Court Said

State Bank of India faces a big setback as the Apex Court of India dismissed its plea seeking an extension of the deadline to disclose the details of electoral bonds.

Headed by CJ of India DY Chandrachud the five-judge bench comprised justices Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, who directed SBI to disclose the details by 12th March.

Additionally, the Supreme Court ordered the Election Commission of India to publish the compiled details on its official website by 5 pm on March 15th.

What did the court say?

The bench said,” SBI is directed to disclose the details by the close of business hours of March 12.”

“As regards the ECI, we direct that ECI shall compile the information and publish the details on its official website no later than 5 pm on March 15,” the bench further instructed the Election Commission body.

Also read: Vande Bharat: PM Modi To Flag Off 10 New Vande Bharat Trains Tomorrow

It stated that the SBI only needed to open the sealed cover, gather the data, and deliver the information to the EC. It asked the SBI to merely supply the information about donors and bonds that political parties have encashed, without “matching” them.

SC interrogated SBI asking, “In the last 26 days, what steps have you taken? Your application is silent on that.”

During the hearing, the SBI’s senior advocate Harish Salve submitted that more time was needed to compile and compare information from various branches. The bench accepted this. Salve said the SBI could do the job in three weeks if the matching procedure was dropped.

The bench clarified that the bank was not instructed to cross-reference donor and donee details with other information.

“You are stating that there are two distinct information silos, and it would take a lot of work to match them. However, as you can see from the instructions we provided, you were not asked to do this matching task. All we’ve done is order clear transparency. The reasons you are requesting more time are completely at odds with the instructions we gave.” the bench stated.

“The court is not exercising any contempt jurisdiction but we are placing SBI on notice, the court will proceed against it for wilful disobedience, given SBI does not comply with the timelines of the order,” the bench ordered.

Srushti Sharma

Recent Posts

PM Modi Meets Bhutan PM Tobgay At BIMSTEC Summit; Highlights Strong Bilateral Ties & Regional Cooperation

PM Narendra Modi met Bhutanese PM Tshering Tobgay on the sidelines of the 6th BIMSTEC…

5 hours ago

Jamia Students Back Waqf Amendment Bill; Call It A Step Toward Empowerment

The student group 'Shaher-E-Arzoo' expressed firm support for the Waqf Amendment Bill, calling it a…

7 hours ago

India’s Exports To The US Face Limited Impact From Tariff Hike: SBI Report

The 27% tariff hike by US President Donald Trump on Indian goods will have only…

8 hours ago

Waqf Freed From Mafia Control, New Era Of Development Begins For Muslims: MRM

Following the passage of the Waqf Amendment Bill 2024 in both Houses of Parliament, celebrations…

9 hours ago

India’s Forex Reserves Surge To $665.4 Billion; Rupee Strengthens As Trade Deficit Narrows

India’s forex reserves jumped $6.6 billion to a five-month high of $665.4 billion for the…

9 hours ago

Laxmi Singh Leads Gautam Buddha Nagar Police To Historic No 1 Rank In IGRS Across All Stations

Gautam Buddha Nagar Police, led by CP Laxmi Singh, achieved a historic feat with all…

10 hours ago