India

Dehadrai Withdraws Defamation Suit Against Moitra in Delhi HC

Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai has withdrawn his defamation case against Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra in the Delhi High Court. Justice Prateek Jalan recorded in his order, “Learned counsel for the plaintiff upon instructions seeks permission to withdraw the suit, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.”

Dehadrai had filed the defamation suit against Moitra, alleging that she made defamatory allegations against him in media interviews, branding him as “jobless” and “jilted”. During the hearing, advocate Raghav Awasthi, representing Dehadrai, stated that they were willing to withdraw the suit if Moitra refrained from making false statements against him. Advocate Samudra Sarangi, appearing for Moitra, agreed to obtain instructions on this matter.

Justice Jalan suggested that resolving the dispute outside the public domain would benefit both parties, and proposed that the lawyers from both sides collaborate to draft an order applicable to both. Awasthi then announced the unconditional withdrawal of the suit, to which the Court acceded.

In the defamation suit, Dehadrai sought directions to restrain Moitra from making defamatory allegations and demanded ₹2 crore in damages. He also sought orders against several media organizations and online platforms to remove defamatory content.

The case originated from allegations made by Dehadrai that Moitra accepted bribes from businessman Darshan Hiranandani for parliamentary questions, leading to a complaint filed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. Moitra subsequently sued both Dehadrai and Dubey for defamation, but her plea for interim injunction was rejected by the High Court.

During a previous hearing, the High Court expressed dissatisfaction with Dehadrai for speaking to the media about the case while it was pending. Justice Jalan cautioned both parties against making false statements, stating that he would not hesitate to issue injunctions if necessary.

The developments underscore the legal battle between Dehadrai and Moitra, highlighting the complexities of defamation cases and the importance of responsible communication in legal proceedings.

Also Read: Delhi Court Grants 30-Day Extension to Police in Parliament Security Breach Case

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

India Poised For Highest G20 Growth: Moody’s

Moody’s has forecasted India’s GDP growth at 6.5% for 2025-26, maintaining its position as the…

12 mins ago

Nushrratt Bharuccha Shares Her Thrilling Journey With ‘Chhorii 2’

As the sequel to the hit horror film ‘Chhorii’ approaches its release, Nushrratt Bharuccha expresses…

28 mins ago

India’s Defence Exports Reach Record Rs 23,622 Crore In 2024-25

India’s defence exports hit a record Rs 23,622 crore ($2.76 billion) in 2024-25, up 12.04%…

30 mins ago

Passenger & Cargo Traffic On National Waterways Sees Massive Surge

India’s national waterways have witnessed a significant rise in both passenger and cargo traffic over…

41 mins ago

Supreme Court Seeks Reply On Uttarakhand Madrasa Crackdown

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Centre and Uttarakhand on a petition challenging the…

1 hour ago

Supreme Court Rejects Medha Patkar’s Plea In Defamation Case

The Supreme Court upheld Medha Patkar’s defamation conviction in a case filed by Delhi’s Lieutenant…

2 hours ago