India

Dehadrai Withdraws Defamation Suit Against Moitra in Delhi HC

Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai has withdrawn his defamation case against Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra in the Delhi High Court. Justice Prateek Jalan recorded in his order, “Learned counsel for the plaintiff upon instructions seeks permission to withdraw the suit, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.”

Dehadrai had filed the defamation suit against Moitra, alleging that she made defamatory allegations against him in media interviews, branding him as “jobless” and “jilted”. During the hearing, advocate Raghav Awasthi, representing Dehadrai, stated that they were willing to withdraw the suit if Moitra refrained from making false statements against him. Advocate Samudra Sarangi, appearing for Moitra, agreed to obtain instructions on this matter.

Justice Jalan suggested that resolving the dispute outside the public domain would benefit both parties, and proposed that the lawyers from both sides collaborate to draft an order applicable to both. Awasthi then announced the unconditional withdrawal of the suit, to which the Court acceded.

In the defamation suit, Dehadrai sought directions to restrain Moitra from making defamatory allegations and demanded ₹2 crore in damages. He also sought orders against several media organizations and online platforms to remove defamatory content.

The case originated from allegations made by Dehadrai that Moitra accepted bribes from businessman Darshan Hiranandani for parliamentary questions, leading to a complaint filed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. Moitra subsequently sued both Dehadrai and Dubey for defamation, but her plea for interim injunction was rejected by the High Court.

During a previous hearing, the High Court expressed dissatisfaction with Dehadrai for speaking to the media about the case while it was pending. Justice Jalan cautioned both parties against making false statements, stating that he would not hesitate to issue injunctions if necessary.

The developments underscore the legal battle between Dehadrai and Moitra, highlighting the complexities of defamation cases and the importance of responsible communication in legal proceedings.

Also Read: Delhi Court Grants 30-Day Extension to Police in Parliament Security Breach Case

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

India Strengthens Economic Ties With EFTA: A New Era Of Growth And Partnership

India’s growing partnership with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) offers promising opportunities for economic…

2 hours ago

Apple’s Projected Revenue Surge In 2024, Driven By iPhone 16e Launch

Apple is set to generate an estimated $11 billion in revenue from iPhone sales this…

2 hours ago

PM Modi Emphasizes Leadership’s Role In National Progress At SOUL Conclave

PM Modi highlighted vital role of leadership in driving national progress, stressing need for a…

2 hours ago

Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Highlights Growth Plans to Achieve $1 Trillion Economy Goal

UP CM Yogi Adityanath reaffirmed the state's commitment to reaching a $1 trillion economy by…

2 hours ago

NPS AUM Set To Double, Expected To Reach Rs 29.5 Lakh Crore In 5 Years

The National Pension System (NPS) is poised for significant growth, with AUM expected to more…

2 hours ago

NCS Portal Hits Milestone, Mobilizes Over 440 Million Vacancies And Registers 4 Million Employers

India’s National Career Service (NCS) portal has made significant strides in connecting job seekers and…

2 hours ago