India

Dehadrai Withdraws Defamation Suit Against Moitra in Delhi HC

Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai has withdrawn his defamation case against Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra in the Delhi High Court. Justice Prateek Jalan recorded in his order, “Learned counsel for the plaintiff upon instructions seeks permission to withdraw the suit, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.”

Dehadrai had filed the defamation suit against Moitra, alleging that she made defamatory allegations against him in media interviews, branding him as “jobless” and “jilted”. During the hearing, advocate Raghav Awasthi, representing Dehadrai, stated that they were willing to withdraw the suit if Moitra refrained from making false statements against him. Advocate Samudra Sarangi, appearing for Moitra, agreed to obtain instructions on this matter.

Justice Jalan suggested that resolving the dispute outside the public domain would benefit both parties, and proposed that the lawyers from both sides collaborate to draft an order applicable to both. Awasthi then announced the unconditional withdrawal of the suit, to which the Court acceded.

In the defamation suit, Dehadrai sought directions to restrain Moitra from making defamatory allegations and demanded ₹2 crore in damages. He also sought orders against several media organizations and online platforms to remove defamatory content.

The case originated from allegations made by Dehadrai that Moitra accepted bribes from businessman Darshan Hiranandani for parliamentary questions, leading to a complaint filed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. Moitra subsequently sued both Dehadrai and Dubey for defamation, but her plea for interim injunction was rejected by the High Court.

During a previous hearing, the High Court expressed dissatisfaction with Dehadrai for speaking to the media about the case while it was pending. Justice Jalan cautioned both parties against making false statements, stating that he would not hesitate to issue injunctions if necessary.

The developments underscore the legal battle between Dehadrai and Moitra, highlighting the complexities of defamation cases and the importance of responsible communication in legal proceedings.

Also Read: Delhi Court Grants 30-Day Extension to Police in Parliament Security Breach Case

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Supreme Court Rejects PIL Seeking CBI Probe Into Children’s Deaths From Toxic Cough Syrup

Supreme Court dismisses PIL seeking CBI probe into children’s deaths from toxic cough syrup; states…

2 hours ago

PM Modi To Visit Sonipat On October 17 To Inaugurate Key Development Projects In Haryana

PM Modi will visit Sonipat on October 17 to inaugurate key projects, advancing Haryana’s growth…

3 hours ago

Adani Urges India To Own Its Narrative At Whistling Woods International, Mumbai

Gautam Adani highlights the power of storytelling in shaping national identity and warns against letting…

4 hours ago

Salman Khan Pays Tribute To ‘Tiger 3’ Co-Star Varinder Singh Ghuman Following Sudden Death

Salman Khan mourns the death of actor and bodybuilder Varinder Singh Ghuman, co-star from Tiger…

6 hours ago

MLN Medical College To Host Prestigious Alumni CME & Orations 2025 Featuring Global Surgical Experts

MLN Medical College, Prayagraj, will host Alumni CME & Prestigious Orations 2025, featuring top surgeons…

6 hours ago

Explosions Reported In Kabul; Taliban Urges Calm As Probe Underway On Afghan Minister’s India Visit

Explosions near Kabul airport prompt a Taliban probe as Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi…

7 hours ago