India

Dehadrai Withdraws Defamation Suit Against Moitra in Delhi HC

Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai has withdrawn his defamation case against Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader Mahua Moitra in the Delhi High Court. Justice Prateek Jalan recorded in his order, “Learned counsel for the plaintiff upon instructions seeks permission to withdraw the suit, the suit is dismissed as withdrawn.”

Dehadrai had filed the defamation suit against Moitra, alleging that she made defamatory allegations against him in media interviews, branding him as “jobless” and “jilted”. During the hearing, advocate Raghav Awasthi, representing Dehadrai, stated that they were willing to withdraw the suit if Moitra refrained from making false statements against him. Advocate Samudra Sarangi, appearing for Moitra, agreed to obtain instructions on this matter.

Justice Jalan suggested that resolving the dispute outside the public domain would benefit both parties, and proposed that the lawyers from both sides collaborate to draft an order applicable to both. Awasthi then announced the unconditional withdrawal of the suit, to which the Court acceded.

In the defamation suit, Dehadrai sought directions to restrain Moitra from making defamatory allegations and demanded ₹2 crore in damages. He also sought orders against several media organizations and online platforms to remove defamatory content.

The case originated from allegations made by Dehadrai that Moitra accepted bribes from businessman Darshan Hiranandani for parliamentary questions, leading to a complaint filed by BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. Moitra subsequently sued both Dehadrai and Dubey for defamation, but her plea for interim injunction was rejected by the High Court.

During a previous hearing, the High Court expressed dissatisfaction with Dehadrai for speaking to the media about the case while it was pending. Justice Jalan cautioned both parties against making false statements, stating that he would not hesitate to issue injunctions if necessary.

The developments underscore the legal battle between Dehadrai and Moitra, highlighting the complexities of defamation cases and the importance of responsible communication in legal proceedings.

Also Read: Delhi Court Grants 30-Day Extension to Police in Parliament Security Breach Case

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Court Reserves Decision On Satyendra Jain’s Bail Plea In Money Laundering Case

Satyendra Jain is currently lodged in Tihar Jail in connection with a money laundering case.…

9 mins ago

Protest In Rajouri Against Alleged Blasphemous Remarks By Swami Yati Narsimhanand

The protesters highlighted that the comments had offended Muslims globally and locally. They warned that…

42 mins ago

Not Going For Two-Nation Dialogue But For Multilateral Event: Jaishankar On His Pak Visit For SCO Summit

Jaishankar also spoke about Pakistan's continued support for terrorism. He reiterated that such behavior cannot…

50 mins ago

Dying Declarations Must Be Verified for Conviction: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court ruled that a conviction cannot be sustained based solely on a…

52 mins ago

RG Kar Tragedy: Four cops On Duty On August 9 Under CBI Scanner

The CBI is also examining CCTV footage from the hospital. Investigators are checking for signs…

59 mins ago

Haryana Elections Witness 40% Voter Turnout By 1 PM; Minor Skirmishes Reported

A total of 2.03 crore voters, including 1.07 crore men, 95.7 lakh women, and 467…

1 hour ago