India

Allahabad High Court Upholds Varanasi District Court’s Decision on Gyanvapi Mosque Prayers Dispute

In a significant development, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the Gyanvapi Mosque committee challenging the Varanasi district court’s ruling permitting prayers in a cellar within the Gyanvapi mosque complex. Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal of the Allahabad HC delivered the judgment.

Justice Agarwal, while pronouncing the verdict, stated, “After thoroughly examining the case records and considering arguments from all parties involved, the court found no grounds to intervene in the district judge’s decision dated 17th January 2024 appointing the District Magistrate of Varanasi as the property receiver, as well as the order dated 31st January 2024 permitting Puja in the Tehkhana.”

The Varanasi district court’s ruling on January 31 allowed the Hindu side to conduct prayers in the southern cellar of the Gyanvapi mosque, known as the ‘Vyas Tehkhana.’ Additionally, the court directed the district magistrate to arrange for the Puja and a pujari nominated by the Shri Kashi Vishwanath Temple Trust.

Following this ruling, the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee, which oversees the management of the Gyanvapi Mosque, challenged the decision before the Allahabad High Court on February 1. This move came after the Supreme Court declined an urgent hearing of the mosque committee’s plea.

Also read: Allahabad High Court to Deliver Verdict on Hindu Prayers in Gyanvapi Mosque Cellar Dispute

The mosque, housing four ‘tahkhanas’ (cellars) in its basement, retains one under the possession of the Vyas family, who formerly resided there. However, the mosque committee asserted that the ‘Vyas Tehkhana’ is part of the mosque premises and that no individual, including the Vyas family, has the right to worship within it.

On the other hand, the Hindu side contended that religious ceremonies were conducted by the Vyas family in the basement until 1993, following which they ceased in compliance with a directive from the state government.

Meanwhile, AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi criticized the Varanasi court’s decision, labeling it a “violation of the Places of Worship Act.” He questioned the judge’s knowledge about the presence of an idol inside, emphasizing the need for a fair appeal process.

The verdict marks a significant development in the ongoing legal battle surrounding the Gyanvapi mosque, reflecting the complex interplay of religious sentiments and legal provisions.

Srushti Sharma

Recent Posts

Bharat Express CMD Upendrra Rai’s Elder Brother Rajesh Rai Passes Away; Final Rites On 27 October

Rajesh Rai, elder brother of Bharat Express CMD Upendrra Rai, passed away in Delhi on…

37 mins ago

Railway Fact Check Denies Lalu’s Charge Of Fewer Trains For Bihar During Chhath Festival

RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav accused the Central government of misleading the public by promising…

2 hours ago

Virat Kohli Becomes Second-Highest Run-Getter In ODIs

Indian cricket star Virat Kohli surpassed Kumar Sangakkara to become the second-highest run-scorer in One-Day…

3 hours ago

Amit Shah Accuses Lalu Regime Of Lawlessness & Industrial Decline At Bihar Rally

Union Home Minister Amit Shah launched a sharp attack on RJD chief Lalu Prasad Yadav…

4 hours ago

Veteran Actor Satish Shah Passes Away At 74 In Mumbai

Veteran actor Satish Shah, known for his roles in Jaane Bhi Do Yaaro, Sarabhai vs…

4 hours ago

CJI Gavai Meets Bhutan King And PM To Strengthen Judicial Cooperation

CJI BR Gavai met Bhutan’s King and PM to strengthen judicial cooperation and announced clerkship…

5 hours ago