Business

BYJU’S Denies Allegations of Concealing $500 Million via US Subsidiary BYJU Alpha

BYJU’S Alpha, a non-operational US entity with no employees, faces refutation from edtech giant BYJU’S regarding allegations of hiding $500 million. BYJU’S dismisses the claims made in the Delaware court as ‘bewildering’.

Also Read: Oracle’s Cost-Cutting Measures Result in Over 3,000 Layoffs from Healthcare Database Unit

Regarding the matter, the company issued a statement stating, “The recent order from a Delaware Court is an interim measure to preserve the current state of affairs concerning BYJU’S Alpha, which is a non-functional US entity created solely to receive the Term Loan B and does not have any employees.”

The company BYJU’S has responded to claims made by the litigants regarding the transfer of $500 million from BYJU’S Alpha. BYJU’S denies the allegations and states that the claims are bewildering and incorrect. Although BYJU’S admits to transferring the funds, it asserts that the transfer did not violate any Credit Agreement.

BYJU’S has clarified that the transferred funds were used for growth and expansion in its global operations. According to BYJU’S, the intention behind entering into the Term Loan B agreement was to utilize the raised funds for driving growth and expansion, allowing them to transfer and use the funds as needed. The company also emphasized that it has fulfilled all contractual payment obligations outlined in the Term Loan B agreement, without missing any payments. BYJU’S dismissed the allegations of default by the lenders, describing them as minor technical and non-monetary issues.

Also Read: Shein To Strat A New Chapter In India With Its Partnership With RIL

Glas Trust Company and investor Timothy R. Pohl have filed a lawsuit against BYJU’S Alpha, its director Riju Ravindran, and Tangible Play Inc., which are all part of Byju Raveendran’s Edtech empire. The allegations of concealing $500 million from lenders emerged during a Delaware court hearing, where BYJU’S Alpha is engaged in a legal dispute with its lenders over control of the company. Furthermore, the lenders argue that they have the right to appoint their representative, Timothy R. Pohl, as the company’s controller.due to BYJU’S earlier default.

During the court hearing, BYJU’S Alpha countered the lenders’ claims by stating that they were distressed debt investors seeking to profit from the company’s debt.

Shruti Rag

Recent Posts

5th SportsForAll Foundation Sponsorship Program 2025 Concludes Successfully

The 5th edition of the SportsForAll Foundation Sponsorship Program 2025, dedicated to air pistol and…

6 mins ago

India’s Petrochemical Industry Poised For Growth Amidst Global Challenges

India’s vision of an Atmanirbhar Bharat, or self-reliant India, calls for transforming the country into…

13 mins ago

India’s Renewable Energy Share To Remain Stable At 21% In FY25; Says Ind-Ra Report

India's renewable energy share, including large hydro, is expected to remain stable at nearly 21%…

24 mins ago

India’s DRDO Successfully Tests Scramjet Combustor For Hypersonic Missiles

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has achieved a significant milestone with the successful…

26 mins ago

Indian Brands Continue To Climb In Brand Finance Rankings For 2025

Indian brands have maintained strong momentum in the 2025 Brand Finance rankings, with Tata Group…

49 mins ago

Indian CEOs Show Strong Optimism For Economic Growth, But Face Challenges

Indian CEOs optimistic about country’s economic growth, far surpassing global average of 57%, according to…

55 mins ago