AI Generated Image
In a significant ruling, a Delhi court has convicted a serving Joint Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and a retired Delhi Police officer for their role in a pre-dawn raid conducted in 2000 on the residence of an Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer.
The court held that the operation carried mala fide intent to undermine a tribunal order.
Judicial Magistrate First Class Shashank Nandan Bhatt delivered the judgment at Tis Hazari Courts.
The convicted officials, Ramneesh, currently a Joint Director in the CBI, and VK Pandey, a retired Assistant Commissioner of Police, were found guilty under Sections 323, 427, 448, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. These charges relate to voluntarily causing hurt, mischief, criminal trespass, and acts committed with common intention.
The case stems from a complaint filed by Ashok Kumar Aggarwal. He was a 1985-batch IRS officer serving as Deputy Director of Enforcement at the time of the incident. His later discharge covered both CBI cases registered against him.
The court determined the conduct of the search and arrest on October 19, 2000. The action had the sole objective of nullifying an earlier order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The tribunal had directed a review of the officer’s deemed suspension.
It held that the accused misused their official authority and acted outside the scope of lawful duty. As a result, they lacked entitlement to the legal protection typically granted to public servants under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code or the provisions of the Delhi Police Act.
The court also established that the officials forcibly entered the complainant’s residence by breaking open the main sliding door. This act found corroboration in their own documentation submitted before the Delhi High Court. It constituted criminal trespass and mischief.
Further evidence, including eyewitness accounts, medical records, and admissions made in court filings, confirmed that the complainant suffered a physical assault. Assailants dragged him from his bedroom, manhandled him on the stairs, and caused injuries to his right forearm.
The court concluded that the sequence of events pointed to a deliberate conspiracy. The officials did not respond to a vigilance communication due on October 18, 2000. Instead, they held a meeting and decided to conduct the raid and arrest the complainant the following morning.
According to the case record, the IRS officer had been probing sensitive cases under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) involving influential individuals. He had reported interference in his investigations through multiple representations to senior authorities between 1998 and 1999.
Subsequently, a person he was investigating filed a complaint against him, leading to a CBI case.
Despite cooperating with the investigation and appearing multiple times for questioning, the officer alleged continued harassment.
On October 19, 2000, at around 05:00 AM, a team of CBI officials arrived at his residence. The security guard faced assault when he asked for identification.
The team allegedly entered the premises by force, confined family members, and took the officer into custody after physically assaulting him. His initial detention took place at an undisclosed location before his subsequent transfer to Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital later that morning.
The court also noted allegations that he faced threats of further action against his family if he raised objections in court.
The court dismissed the defence arguments, citing inconsistencies in their version of events.
Trial witnesses claimed minimal force sufficed. Official records, however, submitted earlier indicated a forced entry.
The court also noted the absence of any seized documents, undermining the justification for the raid.
Arguments questioning the validity of the medical examination report were also rejected. The document had already been acknowledged in prior proceedings. It also included references to injuries sustained by the complainant.
The approximately one-year delay in filing the complaint appeared justified. This was due to the position of authority held by the accused and the threats allegedly made to the complainant and his family.
The court held that the actions of the accused were deliberate and aimed at preventing the complainant from benefiting from the tribunal’s order. It concluded that the prosecution had established the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
The court formally pronounced the conviction of the two officials in open court on April 18, 2026.
Also Read: NIA Court Grants Default Bail To 15 Accused In Beldanga Violence Case
To read more such news, download Bharat Express news apps
