Supreme Court Raises Concerns Over Misuse Of Ration Cards And Free Ration Distribution

The Supreme Court has expressed concern over the misuse of ration cards, particularly in relation to migrant laborers.

During a hearing on the issue, the court questioned whether states are using ration cards as a tool for publicity.

The court raised doubts about whether benefits intended for genuine Below Poverty Line (BPL) families are being diverted to individuals who are not entitled to them.

Ration System Failing To Reach Target Beneficiaries

A bench consisting of Justice Suryakant and Justice N Kotishwar Singh highlighted the discrepancy between the states’ claims and the reality of ration distribution.

They criticized states for showcasing the number of ration cards issued rather than ensuring that subsidized essential commodities reach the rightful BPL beneficiaries.

Justice Suryakant expressed concern that ration cards have become a symbol of popularity rather than a means to help the needy.

State Governments’ Claims vs Ground Reality

The court noted the apparent contradiction in state claims. On one hand, state governments boast of issuing a large number of BPL cards, while on the other, they claim that 75 percent of the population falls under the BPL category.

Also Read: Supreme Court To Hear Petitions Challenging New Law On Chief Election Commissioner Appointments

The bench questioned how such disparities could be resolved, emphasizing that the system needs to ensure that benefits reach the actual eligible individuals and families.

Court Criticizes Free Ration Distribution Amid Employment Concerns

In a previous hearing, the Supreme Court raised concerns about the long-term implications of free ration schemes.

The court had questioned the sustainability of distributing free rations, especially following the pandemic, and urged the government to focus on creating employment opportunities instead.

The court expressed surprise over the fact that 81 crore people in India had received free or subsidized ration under the National Food Security Act.

Government’s Response To Free Ration Debate

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, representing the central government, defended the free ration distribution.

They explained that the government had provided free rations to the poor, particularly migrant laborers, during and after the COVID-19 crisis.

However, the court countered by questioning the fairness of such a system, pointing out that it left only taxpayers to bear the burden.

Focus On Employment Opportunities For Migrant Laborers

Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, suggested that migrant laborers registered on the e-Shramik portal should receive free rations.

In response, the Supreme Court emphasized that rather than relying on free ration distribution, the government should focus on creating employment opportunities and capacity-building initiatives for migrant workers to ensure long-term welfare.

The court’s comments reflect its growing concern about the effectiveness of welfare programs and the need for a more sustainable solution to address poverty and unemployment in India.