Legal

Supreme Court Allows Judicial Officers To Directly Become Additional District Judges

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court’s Constitution Bench, headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, has ruled that judicial officers can now directly become Additional District Judges.

The bench, which included Justices MM Sundresh, Arvind Kumar, SC Sharma, and K Vinod Chandran, interpreted Article 233(2) to expand eligibility criteria for recruitment.

The court clarified that judicial officers with a minimum of seven years of combined experience in legal practice and judicial service are now eligible to appear in the direct recruitment examination.

According to the verdict, judicial officers who have previously completed seven years of legal practice alone may apply for the post of Additional District Judge. Judicial officers with a combined seven years of advocacy and judicial service are also eligible to apply.

The Constitution Bench clarified that authorities will assess eligibility based on the date of application, not the date of appointment.

The court has prescribed a minimum age of 35 years for all candidates, whether they are advocates or judicial officers.

States and High Courts Directed to Amend Rules

The bench directed all state governments and High Courts to revise their recruitment rules within three months to comply with the judgment.

The court also clarified that authorities will apply the ruling prospectively and will not alter selection processes that have already been completed.

The judgment stems from a detailed interpretation of Article 233, which governs the appointment, posting, and promotion of district judges in each state. The article states that the state governor appoints district judges in consultation with the respective High Court.

Legal experts believe this decision will streamline the recruitment of Additional District Judges and provide a more flexible pathway for judicial officers to advance in their careers.

By recognising combined experience, the court has widened opportunities for senior legal professionals, potentially improving judicial efficiency across the country.

The Supreme Court’s ruling marks a significant step in modernising India’s judicial appointment system and ensuring a merit-based approach to key positions within the judiciary.

Also Read: Supreme Court Allows Ashish Mishra Diwali Leave; Orders DSP Probe Into Witness Threat Allegations

Geetanjali Mishra

Recent Posts

Each Vote Is For Viksit Bihar, Not Just An MLA, Says Amit Shah In Lakhisarai Rally

Amit Shah on Thursday praised the Nitish Kumar-led NDA’s development model and slammed the RJD…

1 hour ago

Two Yuvrajs Are Misleading Voters With Hollow Promises, Says PM Modi In Bihar Rally

On Thursday, PM Modi, campaigning in Bihar, accused Rahul Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav of misleading…

2 hours ago

We’re Working To Get Chhath Maha Parv Listed As UNESCO World Heritage: PM Modi

PM Narendra Modi on Thursday greeted the people of Bihar, calling Chhath Puja a symbol…

2 hours ago

Supreme Court Rejects Bihar Chief Secretary’s Plea For Exemption In Stray Dog Case

SC has rejected Bihar Chief Secretary’s request for exemption from personal appearance in the ongoing…

3 hours ago

Took 41 Years For Congress To Honour Patel With Bharat Ratna, Asserts Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Thursday accused the Congress of denying due credit to…

4 hours ago

Delhi Braces For Chilly, Fog-Laden November As Pollution Levels Worsen

As November nears, Delhi and NCR residents can expect colder, foggier mornings and worsening air…

4 hours ago