India

Supreme Court Ruling: Police Officers Face Action for Revealing Names in History Sheets

In a landmark verdict, Justices Surya Kant and KV Vishwanathan addressed a petition challenging Delhi Police’s declaration of General MLA Amanatullah Khan as a “bad character.” The court warned that any police officer knowingly identifying Khan’s minor sons would face legal repercussions. It emphasized that revealing such information, without adherence to Delhi Police protocols, warrants disciplinary action. Expanding the case’s scope, the Supreme Court directed all Indian state governments to clarify their policies regarding history sheets on criminals. It stressed that these documents, which detail alleged criminals’ cases and their associates, should remain internal and not be disclosed publicly.

The court underscored the importance of regularly reviewing history sheets to remove innocent individuals’ names and details, particularly from marginalized communities. It deemed the practice of recording innocent people’s names as a violation of dignity.

Amanatullah Khan raised concerns over Delhi Police making his family’s history sheet public, asserting it as a politically motivated attack. Last year, Delhi Police labeled him a “bad character” after he obstructed an encroachment removal process. While the Delhi High Court dismissed his petition, it granted him the right to challenge the label’s removal.

Khan’s lawyer accused a rival political party’s spokesperson of sharing a replica of his confidential history sheet on social media to tarnish his reputation. The proposal to declare Khan a “bad character” originated from Jamia Nagar police station and was approved in March 2022, citing 18 registered FIRs against him.

In a separate matter, the Supreme Court declined relief to Amanatullah Khan in a money laundering case dating from 2018 to 2022. He faces allegations of irregularities during his tenure as Chairman of Delhi Waqf Board, including misappropriation of board properties and improper employee appointments. Despite repeated summons, Khan had failed to appear before the Enforcement Directorate, prompting the court’s decision.

Also Read: High Voter Turnout Marks Third Phase Of Lok Sabha Elections Across States

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Reliance Jio Adds 10 Times More Mobile Users Than Airtel In September: TRAI Data

Reliance Jio added 1.9 million mobile subscribers in September, nearly 10 times Airtel’s 200,000 additions,…

35 mins ago

Amit Shah Announces Uniform Civil Code In UP If BJP Returns To Power In 2027

Amit Shah announced the BJP’s plan to implement the Uniform Civil Code in Uttar Pradesh…

46 mins ago

PM Modi Releases 24th PM-KISAN Instalment Of Rs 18,680 Crore To 9.34 Crore Farmers

PM Modi releases Rs 18,680 crore under PM-KISAN's 24th instalment, benefiting 9.34 crore farmer families…

1 hour ago

PM Modi Says Agriculture Budget Increased Fivefold Since 2013-14; Farmers Gained Rs 50 Lakh Crore

PM Modi said the agriculture budget rose over fivefold since 2013-14, with farmers gaining Rs…

1 hour ago

Kochi Police Book YouTuber Amrit Singh Darren Over Alleged Communal Remarks About Fort Kochi Cafe

Kerala Police book YouTuber Amrit Singh Darren over alleged communal remarks targeting Fort Kochi’s Kashi…

2 hours ago

HM Amit Shah Inaugurates UP BJP Executive Committee Meeting In Lucknow Ahead Of 2027 Polls

Amit Shah inaugurated the UP BJP meeting in Lucknow to review preparations for the 2027…

2 hours ago