India

Supreme Court Ruling: Police Officers Face Action for Revealing Names in History Sheets

In a landmark verdict, Justices Surya Kant and KV Vishwanathan addressed a petition challenging Delhi Police’s declaration of General MLA Amanatullah Khan as a “bad character.” The court warned that any police officer knowingly identifying Khan’s minor sons would face legal repercussions. It emphasized that revealing such information, without adherence to Delhi Police protocols, warrants disciplinary action. Expanding the case’s scope, the Supreme Court directed all Indian state governments to clarify their policies regarding history sheets on criminals. It stressed that these documents, which detail alleged criminals’ cases and their associates, should remain internal and not be disclosed publicly.

The court underscored the importance of regularly reviewing history sheets to remove innocent individuals’ names and details, particularly from marginalized communities. It deemed the practice of recording innocent people’s names as a violation of dignity.

Amanatullah Khan raised concerns over Delhi Police making his family’s history sheet public, asserting it as a politically motivated attack. Last year, Delhi Police labeled him a “bad character” after he obstructed an encroachment removal process. While the Delhi High Court dismissed his petition, it granted him the right to challenge the label’s removal.

Khan’s lawyer accused a rival political party’s spokesperson of sharing a replica of his confidential history sheet on social media to tarnish his reputation. The proposal to declare Khan a “bad character” originated from Jamia Nagar police station and was approved in March 2022, citing 18 registered FIRs against him.

In a separate matter, the Supreme Court declined relief to Amanatullah Khan in a money laundering case dating from 2018 to 2022. He faces allegations of irregularities during his tenure as Chairman of Delhi Waqf Board, including misappropriation of board properties and improper employee appointments. Despite repeated summons, Khan had failed to appear before the Enforcement Directorate, prompting the court’s decision.

Also Read: High Voter Turnout Marks Third Phase Of Lok Sabha Elections Across States

Srishti Verma

Recent Posts

Adani Group Launches Website To Showcase Maha Kumbh’s Diversity And Service Efforts

Adani Group has launched a new website, https://mahakumbhmela2025.org, dedicated to the ongoing Maha Kumbh in…

10 hours ago

Dr. Dinesh Sharma Criticizes ‘English Mentality’ And Advocates For Hindi, Values, And National Culture

A literary and cultural felicitation ceremony organized by Vishwa Hindi Manch in Hapur, Dr. Dinesh…

10 hours ago

Rahul Gandhi Meets Protesting BPSC Candidates In Patna; Demonstrates Solidarity

Congress MP Rahul Gandhi met with protesting BPSC exam candidates in Patna on Saturday, a…

11 hours ago

Adani Group Partners With Gita Press To Serve Devotees At Maha Kumbh 2025

Gautam Adani is joining forces with a 101-year-old institution, Gita Press, to provide essential services…

11 hours ago

Victim’s Father Calls For Next Phase Of Justice After RG Kar Verdict

After the conviction of civic volunteer Sanjay Roy for the rape and murder of a…

13 hours ago

Cops Held Accountable: Himachal IG, 7 Others Convicted For Custodial Death

In a significant verdict, a CBI court convicted Himachal Pradesh Inspector General of Police ZH…

13 hours ago