The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking clarification on the meaning of words in the preamble of the Constitution. The court stated that it is not their role to interpret these terms and advised the petitioner to understand them independently.
The bench, consisting of Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar, ruled that interpreting the preamble’s language falls outside their jurisdiction. The petition was filed by Shivam Mishra, who argued that certain words, such as “brotherhood,” are ambiguous and challenging to comprehend in their present context.
Shivam Mishra contended that the lack of clarity in terms like “brotherhood” has caused him distress. He argued that these terms’ definitions are unclear and that the court should provide relief.
The court remarked that Mishra’s arguments lacked clarity and stated it is not the court’s role to interpret the meanings of constitutional terms. The petitioner’s request for relief was denied based on these grounds.
Also Read: PM Modi Meets Chairman Of Foxconn, Young Liu
PM Modi distributed 51,236 appointment letters to newly-recruited candidates in central government departments and organisations…
The Indian Embassy in Berlin organised a solemn memorial service to honour the victims of…
Pop star Joe Jonas recently performed his latest single, Heart by Heart, to a phone-free…
CSK captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni has openly acknowledged the team's ongoing struggles in the 2025…
The Supreme Court announced on Saturday that a disruption in the National Government Cloud (NGC)…
Following the deadly terrorist attack in Pahalgam on 22 April, Pakistan has escalated tensions by…