The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking clarification on the meaning of words in the preamble of the Constitution. The court stated that it is not their role to interpret these terms and advised the petitioner to understand them independently.
The bench, consisting of Justice Sanjeev Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar, ruled that interpreting the preamble’s language falls outside their jurisdiction. The petition was filed by Shivam Mishra, who argued that certain words, such as “brotherhood,” are ambiguous and challenging to comprehend in their present context.
Shivam Mishra contended that the lack of clarity in terms like “brotherhood” has caused him distress. He argued that these terms’ definitions are unclear and that the court should provide relief.
The court remarked that Mishra’s arguments lacked clarity and stated it is not the court’s role to interpret the meanings of constitutional terms. The petitioner’s request for relief was denied based on these grounds.
Also Read: PM Modi Meets Chairman Of Foxconn, Young Liu
Gautam Adani, Chairman of the Adani Group, visited Puri in Odisha during the annual Rath…
Acharya Pramod Krishnam, stirred political debate by claiming an 'internal emergency' still exists within the…
Taking a crucial step toward positive transformation, social reform, and global peace, the Muslim Rashtriya…
India has been chosen to host the prestigious 2029 World Police and Fire Games in…
Gautam Adani, along with his wife and Karan, participated in the Rath Yatra in Puri,…
PM Narendra Modi interacted with Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla, the first Indian to reach the…