India

Supreme Court: Demonetization Was Valid; Justice Nagrathna Disagrees, See What She Says

While hearing petitions challenging the 2016 banknote demonetisation decision, the Supreme Court says that it will not play the role of a silent spectator and sit quietly with folded hands only because it was an economic policy decision.

“Just because it is an economic decision, does not mean we will fold our hands and sit. We can always examine the manner in which the decision was taken,” said Justice B.V. Nagarathna.

Read this also: SC: PM Modi’s 2016 Note Ban Valid; Could Not Fail As Centre Initiated It

The Apex Court on the Note Ban

Justice BV Nagarathna gave a dissenting judgment, said demonetization could have been executed through an act of Parliament and not by the government. The Supreme Court held that there was a reasonable nexus with the objectives sought to be achieved.

Some 58 petitions had challenged the Centre’s decision of November 2016 to ban ₹ 1,000 and ₹ 500 currency notes.  ₹ 10 lakh crore wiped out of circulation overnight because of the move. Petition argued that it was not a considered decision of the central government. It should be struck down by the court.

The government argued that the court cannot decide a matter when no tangible relief can be granted. It would be like “putting the clock back” or “unscrambling a scrambled egg”, the center said. It also said demonetization was a “well-considered” decision and part of a larger strategy to combat fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

The five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice SA Nazeer heard the arguments before the winter breaks. The other members of the bench are Justices BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Officials On Note Ban

The center said the demonetization was a “well-considered” decision. Part of a larger strategy to combat the menace of fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

Former Union Minister and senior advocate P Chidambaram argued, the center has not examined alternates to control fake currency or black money. Chidambaram said, ‘The government cannot initiate any proposal on legal tender on its own. This, he said, can only be done on the recommendation of the central board of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

 

 

Parth Kakade

Recent Posts

Horoscope Today, 19 October 2026: Know What Your Zodiac Sign Says!

Horoscope Today, 19 October 2026: Curious what the stars have in store? Discover how your…

4 hours ago

Amit Shah To Meet Families Of Those Killed For Opposing Drug Trade In Punjab On October 20

Amit Shah will meet families in three Punjab districts on October 20 and criticised the…

5 hours ago

India Issues Safety Advisory For Nationals In Saudi Arabia As Flights Face Disruptions

India advised nationals in Saudi Arabia to follow safety precautions as airport disruptions and airline…

6 hours ago

Tiger Shroff Shooting Incident: Actor Unhurt, Driver Injured In Juhu Firing

Tiger Shroff escaped unharmed after shots were fired at his car in Juhu, Mumbai. His…

7 hours ago

Avoid Politics That Destabilises The Nation, Respect For The Constitution Is Paramount: Indresh Kumar

Indresh Kumar urged constitutional respect, responsible politics and national unity at a Muslim Rashtriya Manch…

8 hours ago

Asian Para Games 2026: PM Modi Wishes Indian Athletes As India Targets 100 Medals

PM Modi wished India’s 168 athletes success at the Asian Para Games 2026 in Japan,…

9 hours ago