India

Supreme Court: Demonetization Was Valid; Justice Nagrathna Disagrees, See What She Says

While hearing petitions challenging the 2016 banknote demonetisation decision, the Supreme Court says that it will not play the role of a silent spectator and sit quietly with folded hands only because it was an economic policy decision.

“Just because it is an economic decision, does not mean we will fold our hands and sit. We can always examine the manner in which the decision was taken,” said Justice B.V. Nagarathna.

Read this also: SC: PM Modi’s 2016 Note Ban Valid; Could Not Fail As Centre Initiated It

The Apex Court on the Note Ban

Justice BV Nagarathna gave a dissenting judgment, said demonetization could have been executed through an act of Parliament and not by the government. The Supreme Court held that there was a reasonable nexus with the objectives sought to be achieved.

Some 58 petitions had challenged the Centre’s decision of November 2016 to ban ₹ 1,000 and ₹ 500 currency notes.  ₹ 10 lakh crore wiped out of circulation overnight because of the move. Petition argued that it was not a considered decision of the central government. It should be struck down by the court.

The government argued that the court cannot decide a matter when no tangible relief can be granted. It would be like “putting the clock back” or “unscrambling a scrambled egg”, the center said. It also said demonetization was a “well-considered” decision and part of a larger strategy to combat fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

The five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice SA Nazeer heard the arguments before the winter breaks. The other members of the bench are Justices BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Officials On Note Ban

The center said the demonetization was a “well-considered” decision. Part of a larger strategy to combat the menace of fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

Former Union Minister and senior advocate P Chidambaram argued, the center has not examined alternates to control fake currency or black money. Chidambaram said, ‘The government cannot initiate any proposal on legal tender on its own. This, he said, can only be done on the recommendation of the central board of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

 

 

Parth Kakade

Recent Posts

IMF Imposes 11 New Conditions On Pakistan; Flags India Tensions As Major Risk

The IMF has added 11 new conditions to Pakistan’s $7 billion bailout & warned worsening…

21 mins ago

Mindfulness Can Help Reduce Anxiety Through Improved Cognitive Control

Mindfulness helps reduce anxiety by enhancing cognitive control, with tailored techniques offering targeted relief, say…

38 mins ago

Paresh Rawal Addresses Rumours Surrounding ‘Hera Pheri 3’ Exit

Paresh Rawal took to social media to dispel rumours about his departure from ‘Hera Pheri…

1 hour ago

Indian Army Releases ‘Op Sindoor’ Video: ‘Planned, Trained & Executed, Justice Served’

The Indian Army’s Western Command released a compelling video showcasing the success of Operation Sindoor.

2 hours ago

PM Modi Expresses Anguish Over Hyderabad Fire Tragedy; Announces Ex-Gratia For Victims’ Families

Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed deep anguish over the devastating fire incident at Gulzar Houz…

2 hours ago

India-UK FTA To Accelerate Textile Trade Growth Over The Next Five Years

A recent report by ICRA projects a twofold increase in India's apparel and home textiles…

2 hours ago