India

Supreme Court: Demonetization Was Valid; Justice Nagrathna Disagrees, See What She Says

While hearing petitions challenging the 2016 banknote demonetisation decision, the Supreme Court says that it will not play the role of a silent spectator and sit quietly with folded hands only because it was an economic policy decision.

“Just because it is an economic decision, does not mean we will fold our hands and sit. We can always examine the manner in which the decision was taken,” said Justice B.V. Nagarathna.

Read this also: SC: PM Modi’s 2016 Note Ban Valid; Could Not Fail As Centre Initiated It

The Apex Court on the Note Ban

Justice BV Nagarathna gave a dissenting judgment, said demonetization could have been executed through an act of Parliament and not by the government. The Supreme Court held that there was a reasonable nexus with the objectives sought to be achieved.

Some 58 petitions had challenged the Centre’s decision of November 2016 to ban ₹ 1,000 and ₹ 500 currency notes.  ₹ 10 lakh crore wiped out of circulation overnight because of the move. Petition argued that it was not a considered decision of the central government. It should be struck down by the court.

The government argued that the court cannot decide a matter when no tangible relief can be granted. It would be like “putting the clock back” or “unscrambling a scrambled egg”, the center said. It also said demonetization was a “well-considered” decision and part of a larger strategy to combat fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

The five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice SA Nazeer heard the arguments before the winter breaks. The other members of the bench are Justices BR Gavai, AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Officials On Note Ban

The center said the demonetization was a “well-considered” decision. Part of a larger strategy to combat the menace of fake money, terror financing, black money and tax evasion.

Former Union Minister and senior advocate P Chidambaram argued, the center has not examined alternates to control fake currency or black money. Chidambaram said, ‘The government cannot initiate any proposal on legal tender on its own. This, he said, can only be done on the recommendation of the central board of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

 

 

Parth Kakade

Recent Posts

Allahabad High Court Sets Hearing Date For Petition Against PM Modi’s Election

The election petition contests PM Modi's election to the Lok Sabha. The petitioner claims that…

10 hours ago

SC Issues Notice On Petition Challenging Lack Of Transparency In NEET-PG Exam

The petition criticized the NBE's failure to disclose essential examination materials, such as question papers,…

10 hours ago

Jagan Mohan Reddy Demands Action Against Naidu Over Tirumala Ghee Controversy

Reddy accused Naidu of damaging the reputation of the Sri Venkateswara Swamy temple. He claimed…

11 hours ago

Adani Total Gas Secures Largest Global Financing In City Gas Biz At $375 Million

The funds will accelerate ATGL’s capital expenditure program, allowing rapid expansion of its CGD network…

11 hours ago

Ayodhya Mosque-Construction Project In Limbo Over Severe Fund Crunch

IICF members acknowledged the slow fundraising progress, with only about Rs 1 crore raised over…

12 hours ago

BJP President JP Nadda Slams Bhagwant Mann’s Government For Failing To Settle Ayushman Bharat Dues In Punjab

Nadda urged CM Mann to expedite the payment process, highlighting the impact on families, particularly…

12 hours ago