India

Allahabad High Court Denies Bail In Forced Conversion And Exploitation Case

The Allahabad High Court denied bail to Azim, who faces accusations of forced conversion and sexual exploitation. The court highlighted that the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 aims to protect religious freedom and uphold secularism in India. The decision underscores the Act’s intent to foster social harmony and ensure that all individuals’ religious freedom respect.

Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, who led the case, clarified that while the Constitution guarantees the right to practice and propagate one’s religion, it does not grant a collective right to impose conversion on others. Both the person choosing to convert and the person being converted have equal rights to religious freedom.

Azim faces charges under Sections 323, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), and Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. He stands accused of forcibly converting a girl to Islam and sexually exploiting her. Azim applied for bail, asserting that the allegations against him were false. He claimed that the informant, who had been in a relationship with him, left her home voluntarily and confirmed their marriage in statements recorded under Sections 161 and 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC).

Coercion To Convert To Islam

The Public Prosecutor countered by presenting the informant’s statement under Section 164 CrPC, in which she alleged coercion to convert to Islam and described the marriage as occurring without her consent to convert. The court noted that the informant claimed Azim and his family had coerced her into accepting Islam, forced her to witness animal sacrifices on Bakrid, and compelled her to eat non-vegetarian food against her will.

The court also observed that Azim allegedly held the informant captive and pressured her into performing Islamic rituals. Azim failed to provide evidence showing that he had filed an application under Section 8 of the Act to legally convert the informant before their marriage.

Based on these findings, the court determined that a prima facie violation of Sections 3 and 8 of the Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act occurred, which is punishable under Section 5 of the Act. The court therefore rejected Azim’s bail application.

Richa Kaushik

Recent Posts

Ola Electric’s Share Hits All-Time Low Of Rs 74 Ahead Of Q2 Results

Analysts predict that the stock could drop closer to the Rs 70 mark. Ola Electric…

7 mins ago

US Election: Voting Begins With First Ballots Cast In New Hampshire

This election is one of the most divisive in US history. Harris and Trump have…

22 mins ago

Waqf Bill: Opposition MPs Meet LS Speaker, Lodge Protest Against JPC Chairman Jagdambika Pal

Opposition members alleged that Pal calls JPC meetings without consulting them and restricts their opportunity…

39 mins ago

Delhi HC Rejects Khalid Saifi’s Plea To End Attempted Murder Case In 2020 Riots

The Delhi Police opposed Saifi’s bail, citing evidence from WhatsApp messages exchanged among the accused.…

2 hours ago

Maha Kumbh 2025: Uttar Pradesh Enhances Security With Face Recognition Cameras

To protect millions of devotees at Maha Kumbh, the UP govt is implementing advanced security…

2 hours ago

SBI CME Soldierathon Set To Honour Indian Army’s Brave Soldiers On 244th Sappers Day At CME Pune

This landmark event, organized at the historic Military Institute, will honor the sacrifices of the…

2 hours ago