Nepal’s political landscape witnessed a major shift as Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli announced his resignation amid escalating protests across the country.
The unrest began after the government imposed a controversial ban on social media platforms, citing national security and misinformation concerns.
However, the move was met with fierce resistance, particularly from Nepal’s youth, who took to the streets in large numbers.
The protests, which started as peaceful sit-ins and rallies in Kathmandu and other major cities, soon spiralled into violent confrontations with security forces.
Protesters accused the Oli government of suppressing freedom of speech and using authoritarian tactics to silence dissent.
Clashes led to several injuries and widespread damage to public property.
The situation continued to deteriorate, prompting international concern and calls for the restoration of civil liberties.
Youth groups, student unions, and digital rights activists played a central role in organising the demonstrations.
Many argued that the social media ban was an attempt to stifle criticism of the government’s handling of various national issues, including economic instability, unemployment, and lack of transparency.
Protest slogans and banners heavily featured demands for democratic reform, media freedom, and accountability.
Facing increasing pressure from both within his party and the general public, Prime Minister Oli found his position untenable.
Internal dissent within the ruling party further weakened his hold on power, with several senior leaders calling for his resignation.
Critics also condemned the administration’s mishandling of public communication and failure to anticipate the public backlash.
Legal experts and civil society groups condemned the government’s actions as ‘irresponsible’ and ‘unconstitutional’.
Prominent commentators noted that banning platforms instead of addressing misinformation through legal and educational means showed poor judgment.
“You cannot promote a cure for an incurable disease,” remarked one political analyst, drawing a parallel with the unrealistic expectations from such draconian policies.
The move, they argued, not only undermined trust in institutions but also alienated an entire generation of tech-savvy citizens.
With Oli’s resignation, Nepal is now entering a transitional phase. The President is expected to consult with major political parties to determine the formation of a new government.
Observers believe this crisis could serve as a turning point in the country’s democratic journey, with increasing demands for greater accountability, digital rights, and youth participation in governance.
The coming weeks will be critical for Nepal as it attempts to restore stability and address the deep-rooted concerns that led to this political upheaval.
Speculations are already rife that a new Prime Minister could be declared by this evening, as political negotiations intensify behind closed doors.
Also Read: GenZ Revolt Shakes Nepal: Curfew, Resignations And Rising Anger
Horoscope Today, 27 October 2025: Curious what the stars have in store? Discover how your…
Two Patna High Court advocates wrote to Chief Justice BR Gavai, alleging misconduct by ED…
On Monday, Amit Shah will hand over Rs 1.2 crore deep-sea fishing vessels to beneficiaries…
Washington Post reporting on India, including alleged Adani Group support, faces criticism for lack of…
Foreign media scrutiny fails to shake Indians’ faith in LIC as the national insurer reports…
Dr Rajeshwar Singh urges CM Yogi Adityanath to adopt an AI-based humane monitoring system for…