Legal

Supreme Court Issues Notice On AAP Leader Durgesh Pathak’s Petition Against Delhi High Court Ruling

The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the respondents and requested a reply on the petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader and MLA Durgesh Pathak. Pathak filed this petition to contest a Delhi High Court decision that dismissed his plea concerning the legitimacy of his 2022 election to the Rajendra Nagar assembly seat.

High Court’s Decision On Pathak’s Election Opposed On Grounds Of Corruption

The controversy began when a petition challenged Pathak’s election on corruption allegations, arguing that his 2022 victory – secured by a margin of 11,468 votes – tainted. The Delhi High Court dismissed this challenge, noting legal limitations in partially rejecting petitions and asserting that specific claims raised against Pathak deserved further consideration. Notably, the court acknowledged concerns related to the filing of an FIR against Pathak by his opponent concerning alleged inconsistencies in his Form 26 disclosures.

Allegations: Criminal Background, Office Of Profit, & Financial Discrepancies

Petitioner Rajan Tiwari, a Rajendra Nagar voter, opposed Pathak’s election on four key grounds. First, he alleged that Pathak failed to disclose his criminal background while submitting his nomination.

Also Read: Supreme Court Issues Notice To Remo D’Souza, Denies Stay On Fraud Case

Second, he claim Pathak held an office of profit up until the day his nomination was scrutinize. Third, Tiwari argued that Pathak concealed facts in his 2019–2020 income tax returns. Finally, he alleged that Pathak made false claims about private company shares in filings to the Election Commission.

Pathak Argues Petition Against Him Is Unmaintainable

In his Supreme Court petition, Pathak contends that the petition against him, filed under section 7(11)(A) of the Civil Procedure Code, lacks legal grounds and should be dismissed. He disputes the validity of Tiwari’s claims, arguing that the accusations hold no merit in the context of election law.

The Supreme Court has scheduled further hearings in this case, as Pathak seeks to clear his name and uphold the legitimacy of his election victory. With this case drawing national attention, it raises important questions about transparency and accountability for elected officials.

Gopal Krishna

Recent Posts

UPPSC Announces Single-Day PCS (Preliminary) Exam After CM Yogi’s Intervention

In response to demands from competitive exam candidates, the UPPSC announced a major decision to…

2 minutes ago

UPPSC Announces Key Changes To Exam Schedule; PCS Prelims Unchanged, RO/ARO Exams Delayed

 Addressing the concerns of exam aspirants, the UPPSC announced a major change in its examination…

23 minutes ago

PM Modi Arrives In Panvel, Maharashtra, Amidst Devotional Welcome

PM Modi received a warm welcome in Panvel, Maharashtra, from the people of Iskcon, with…

3 hours ago

Kiren Rijiju Launches Book On Waqf Reform, Calls Tt A New Era For Minority Welfare

Kiren Rijiju unveiled a new book titled Waqf Bill 2024: Respect to Islam and Gift…

4 hours ago

Indian Stock Market Extends Losing Streak As Key Sectors Face Selling Pressure

On Thursday, Indian stocks declined for the sixth straight day, with selling in PSU banks,…

7 hours ago

Supreme Court To Address Alarming Rise In Delhi Air Pollution On Monday

Supreme Court will convene to address Delhi’s escalating air pollution crisis, following concerns raised by…

8 hours ago