Legal

SC Gives MP Two Weeks To Decide On Prosecution Of Vijay Shah Over Remarks On Col Sofiya Qureshi

The Supreme Court on Monday instructed the Madhya Pradesh government to decide within two weeks whether to sanction prosecution against Tribal Affairs Minister Kunwar Vijay Shah.

Shah faces legal scrutiny for his controversial comments targeting Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, who briefed the media during last year’s Operation Sindoor.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant expressed frustration over the state government’s delay.

The Court noted that the Special Investigation Team (SIT), appointed by it, had already recommended prosecution.

The bench examined the SIT’s sealed report. It noted that the team had collected evidence and formally requested the state government’s approval to proceed against Shah.

The Madhya Pradesh government told the Court that it had not taken action. It argued that the matter was sub judice before the Supreme Court.

The CJI-led bench rejected this reasoning and directed:

The State must take appropriate legal steps for sanction under the law within two weeks.

The Court also asked the SIT to provide a detailed report on other instances where Shah allegedly made objectionable remarks, and to outline the proposed action in those cases.

Senior advocate Maninder Singh, representing Shah, claimed the minister had apologised and was cooperating with the investigation.

The bench dismissed this, stating, “Where is the apology? Nothing appears on record. Now it is too late.”

Earlier, the apex court had criticised Shah’s alleged online apology as ‘crocodile tears’, aimed at escaping legal consequences.

BJP MLA Vijay Shah of Harsood is a member of CM Mohan Yadav’s Cabinet. He approached the Supreme Court after the MP High Court ordered an FIR against him.

The Supreme Court granted him temporary protection from arrest and coercive action. It instructed the Madhya Pradesh DGP to form a three-member SIT, including a senior woman officer, to conduct a thorough investigation.

The SC’s directive signals strict oversight of political leaders making defamatory remarks against defence personnel. The government now faces pressure to act decisively.

Also Read: Supreme Court Halts Felling Of Over 400 Trees In Chhattisgarh Until Further Orders

Pragati Upadhyay

I report stories and occasionally rescue facts from chaos. By profession, I’m a journalist; by conviction, a social worker who believes words should move people, not just headlines. I question power, celebrate ordinary heroes, and sometimes irritate the comfortable. If truth had a shift, I’d probably be working overtime.

Recent Posts

Bangladesh Name 15-Man Squad For Afghanistan Test, Shanto To Lead

Bangladesh have finalised their squad for the one-off Test against Afghanistan in the UAE, retaining…

6 hours ago

Dr Dinesh Sharma Announces Vision Document To Strengthen Andaman Tourism

Andaman and Nicobar Lieutenant Governor Dr Dinesh Sharma said a vision document will be prepared…

6 hours ago

Shreyas Iyer Looks To Strengthen India’s Combination Ahead Of Asian Games

India T20I captain Shreyas Iyer says the Asian Games will give India an opportunity to…

6 hours ago

LPG Subsidy Rules Tighten As Aadhaar Biometric Verification Becomes Mandatory

The government will require domestic LPG consumers to complete Biometric Aadhaar Authentication from October 1.

7 hours ago

Ranveer Singh And Deepika Padukone Welcome Baby Girl

Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone have welcomed their second child, a baby girl, on September…

8 hours ago

Barapullah Phase III Set For September 29 Opening, Amit Shah To Inaugurate

Union Home Minister Amit Shah will inaugurate Delhi’s Barapullah Phase III corridor on September 29,…

9 hours ago