Legal

Calcutta High Court To Hear ED–I-PAC Petitions After January 8 Raids

Kolkata is bracing for a key hearing at the Calcutta High Court on Wednesday.

Justice Suvra Ghosh’s single-judge bench will consider three petitions and counter-petitions arising from last week’s Enforcement Directorate (ED) raid on I-PAC’s Salt Lake office and Pratik Jain’s residence on Loudon Street.

The court initially listed the matters for hearing on January 9, a day after the ED conducted its operations.

Overcrowding in the courtroom prevented the proceedings from taking place, prompting Justice Ghosh to reschedule the hearing for Wednesday.

In view of the January 9 commotion, Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Sujoy Paul issued a notification restricting entry to the courtroom during the hearing.

The court will allow only the petitioners, respondents, and their legal representatives inside. This measure ensures a controlled environment.

Uncertainty remains over whether Justice Ghosh will ultimately hear the matter. The ED has also filed a related petition that is pending before the Supreme Court.

The ED has filed a petition accusing West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of misusing her constitutional position to obstruct central agency officials during the January 8 raids.

The agency has requested the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe the Chief Minister’s involvement. Additionally, it has asked the CBI to investigate the actions of senior police officials who accompanied her during the raids.

The ED claims that the officials left after collecting certain paper files and electronic documents. It also seeks further investigation into the circumstances surrounding the raids.

Two counter-petitions have also emerged. Pratik Jain submitted one. Meanwhile, the Trinamool Congress filed another, claiming that the ED carried out the actions for political motives.

The Trinamool alleges that the ED aimed to seize documents related to the party’s voter-strategy operations for the 2026 Assembly elections.

The party claims that the ED intended to potentially hand these documents over to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

As the case progresses, the Calcutta High Court is expected to clarify the legal and procedural issues in the high-profile ED-I-PAC controversy. This clarification is likely to take place during Wednesday’s hearing.

Also Read: SC Grants NIA Three Weeks To Respond To Shabir Shah’s Bail Plea

Geetanjali Mishra

Recent Posts

Pet Dog Allegedly Thrown Into Seti River From Pankot Bridge

A woman was allegedly seen throwing a pet dog into the Seti River from Pankot…

8 hours ago

PM Modi Thanks Citizens For Birthday Greetings, Reaffirms Viksit Bharat Vision

Prime Minister Modi thanked citizens for their birthday greetings and blessings, while highlighting public participation…

8 hours ago

Allahabad High Court Bar Polls End With Nearly 79% Turnout

The Allahabad High Court Bar Association’s 2026-27 annual election concluded peacefully in Prayagraj, with 263…

9 hours ago

Abhishek Sharma’s 108-Run Blitz Lifts India To 221/7 In 3rd T20I

Abhishek Sharma struck a breathtaking 108 from 34 balls as India posted 221/7 against Afghanistan…

9 hours ago

OpenAI Flags Six Troubling AI Behaviours In Safety Tests

OpenAI reported six unusual AI behaviours, including attempts to bypass rules and act without user…

10 hours ago

Afghanistan Opt To Bowl As India Eye 3-0 T20I Series Sweep In Delhi

India take on Afghanistan in the final T20I at the Arun Jaitley Stadium with the…

11 hours ago