India

Major Setback For RK Arora Owner Of Supertech As The Delhi High Court Denied His Petition To Have The Detention Lifted

RK Arora, chairman of Supertech, was taken aback when he was named in a money laundering case by the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court upheld the ED’s detention of RK Arora. His request for the Delhi High Court to overturn RK Arora’s arrest was denied. RK Arora, chairman and promoter of real estate major Supertech Group, was arrested by the ED in June 2023.

The investigating agency ED has filed a charge sheet against RK Arora. Ram Kishor Arora, the chairman of Supertech, filed a petition with the Delhi High Court on Friday challenging his detention by the Enforcement Directorate in a money laundering case, but it was dismissed on Friday.

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma ruled that none of Arora’s fundamental rights had been infringed and that there was no evidence to support a denial of his access to legal counsel or representation. According to the court, “the petitioner here failed to show that the petitioner’s arrest is in violation of Section 19 of the PMLA.”

Kapoor claimed that he was arbitrarily and unlawfully detained by ED on June 27 and that neither he nor anybody else was given notice of the reason for his detention. He further asserted that ED had wrongfully denied him his fundamental right under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution to consult with and be represented by a lawyer of his choosing.

However, ED disagreed with the appeal and claimed that the arrest of Kapoor complied fully with Section 19 of the PMLA. When Kapoor was brought before the court within 24 hours of his detention, the remand application was filed, according to the ED’s assertions. Kapoor claimed that he was arbitrarily and unlawfully detained by ED on June 27 and that neither he nor anybody else was given notice of the reason for his detention. He further asserted that ED had wrongfully denied him his fundamental right under Article 22(1) of the Indian Constitution to consult with and be represented by a lawyer of his choosing.

However, ED disagreed with the appeal and claimed that the arrest of Kapoor complied fully with Section 19 of the PMLA. When Kapoor was brought before the court within 24 hours of his detention, the remand application was filed, according to the ED’s assertions. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, along with Advocates R.K.Handoo, Yoginder Handoo, Siddharth Bhatti, Aditya Chaudhary, Ashwin Kataria, Garvit Solank, Bhupendra Premi and Yatin Dev appeared for the petitioner. Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain appeared for ED, along with Advocates Vivek Gurnani, Baibhav, and Mohit Godara.

Srushti Sharma

Recent Posts

Horoscope Today, 12 November 2026: Know What Your Zodiac Sign Says!

Horoscope Today, 12 November 2026: Curious what the stars have in store? Discover how your…

9 hours ago

Nonstick, Stainless Steel Or Cast Iron: Which Cookware Is Right For Your Kitchen?

Compare nonstick, stainless steel and cast iron cookware to find the right fit for your…

10 hours ago

Assam To Set Up Rs 546-Crore Advanced Healthcare Innovation Institute By 2027

Assam's Rs 546-crore institute will develop indigenous medical technologies, including robotic surgical systems and affordable…

10 hours ago

Joe Root Urges England To Sharpen Adaptability Ahead Of Australia ODI Series

Joe Root has called on England to improve their ability to handle different playing conditions…

11 hours ago

Sharwanand’s ‘Bhogi’ Release Postponed; New Theatrical Date To Be Announced

Sharwanand's 'Bhogi' will miss its November 12 release, with the makers citing unforeseen delays and…

11 hours ago

Supreme Court Transfers Commercial Suit From Delhi High Court To Madras High Court

Supreme Court transfers a commercial intellectual property suit from Delhi to Madras HC, citing territorial…

11 hours ago