India

Allahabad High Court Affirms Right To FIR Registration Despite Knowledge Of Facts

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that a magistrate cannot reject the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) simply because the complainant is already aware of the facts surrounding the case.

This decision comes as part of a judicial review of a complaint made by Mukesh Khargwar, a local elected representative from Chandauli.

Justice Manju Rani Chauhan issued this directive after scrutinizing the magistrate’s previous order, deemed to have applied judicial discretion in a mechanical manner.

The court has mandated that the magistrate issue a fresh order within one month, ensuring adherence to proper legal procedures.

Case History

The case originated when Khargwar, a member of the Papoura Development Block in Chhania, sought to voice a no-confidence motion against Arun Kumar Jaiswal, the block chief.

On 4 February 2024, he convened a meeting with fellow council members at the District Magistrate’s office to discuss this motion. However, following the meeting, he became the target of intimidation.

On 14 February 2024, Khargwar alleged that Gopal Singh, also known as Babloo, and Monu Singh arrived in his village with the intent to coerce him into signing an affidavit supporting the block chief.

When he refused, he claimed they subjected him to verbal abuse, including caste-based slurs, and physically assaulted him in an attempt to forcibly take him away.

During the altercation, Khargwar’s wife and several villagers intervened, managing to rescue him from the situation.

Following this distressing event, Khargwar approached the local police station to lodge a formal complaint, but he reported being turned away.

Undeterred, he subsequently filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows a complainant to request that a magistrate direct the police to register an FIR.

Instead of granting this request, the magistrate chose to initiate a complaint case, prompting Khargwar to seek judicial intervention.

The High Court’s ruling not only reinstates the complainant’s rights but also emphasizes the importance of proper legal protocols in the registration of FIRs, especially in cases involving allegations of violence and intimidation.

This judgment is likely to have broader implications for similar cases, reinforcing the legal standards that govern the actions of magistrates in India.

Also Read: Allahabad High Court Upholds Criminal Proceedings Against Key Figures In Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam

Vishal Talwar

Recent Posts

India Posts $13.5 Billion Current Account Surplus In Q4 FY25: RBI

India recorded a current account surplus of $13.5 billion or 1.3% of GDP in Q4…

6 mins ago

PM Modi Pays Tribute To Acharya Vidyanand Ji Maharaj On His Centenary Year

Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched the centenary celebrations of Acharya Vidyanand Ji Maharaj at Vigyan…

21 mins ago

Ram Temple In Ayodhya Draws Over 55 Million Devotees Since Consecration

Since the consecration of Lord Ram at the Ram Temple on January 22, 2024, Ayodhya…

23 mins ago

Over 70% Of Indian Startups Now Rely On AI For Core Business Functions: Meta Report

India’s startup ecosystem is witnessing a major shift, with over 70% of startups now integrating…

35 mins ago

India’s Economic Outlook Remains Positive Amid Global Headwinds: Finance Ministry

India’s economic outlook remains positive in the face of global turbulence, according to the Ministry…

37 mins ago

Govt’s Infrastructure Drive Spurs Manufacturing Confidence, Says Report

A Cushman & Wakefield report says 88% of Indian manufacturers made investment decisions influenced by…

50 mins ago