India

Allahabad High Court Affirms Right To FIR Registration Despite Knowledge Of Facts

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that a magistrate cannot reject the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) simply because the complainant is already aware of the facts surrounding the case.

This decision comes as part of a judicial review of a complaint made by Mukesh Khargwar, a local elected representative from Chandauli.

Justice Manju Rani Chauhan issued this directive after scrutinizing the magistrate’s previous order, deemed to have applied judicial discretion in a mechanical manner.

The court has mandated that the magistrate issue a fresh order within one month, ensuring adherence to proper legal procedures.

Case History

The case originated when Khargwar, a member of the Papoura Development Block in Chhania, sought to voice a no-confidence motion against Arun Kumar Jaiswal, the block chief.

On 4 February 2024, he convened a meeting with fellow council members at the District Magistrate’s office to discuss this motion. However, following the meeting, he became the target of intimidation.

On 14 February 2024, Khargwar alleged that Gopal Singh, also known as Babloo, and Monu Singh arrived in his village with the intent to coerce him into signing an affidavit supporting the block chief.

When he refused, he claimed they subjected him to verbal abuse, including caste-based slurs, and physically assaulted him in an attempt to forcibly take him away.

During the altercation, Khargwar’s wife and several villagers intervened, managing to rescue him from the situation.

Following this distressing event, Khargwar approached the local police station to lodge a formal complaint, but he reported being turned away.

Undeterred, he subsequently filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows a complainant to request that a magistrate direct the police to register an FIR.

Instead of granting this request, the magistrate chose to initiate a complaint case, prompting Khargwar to seek judicial intervention.

The High Court’s ruling not only reinstates the complainant’s rights but also emphasizes the importance of proper legal protocols in the registration of FIRs, especially in cases involving allegations of violence and intimidation.

This judgment is likely to have broader implications for similar cases, reinforcing the legal standards that govern the actions of magistrates in India.

Also Read: Allahabad High Court Upholds Criminal Proceedings Against Key Figures In Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam

Vishal Talwar

Recent Posts

Salman Khan Greets Fans On Eid from Bullet-Proof Balcony Amid Security Concerns

Salman Khan, latest film Sikandar is receiving rave reviews, made his fans’ Eid special by…

7 hours ago

IMD Warns Of Exceptionally Hot Summer In 2025 With Increased Heatwave Days

The IMD has issued a warning about an exceptionally hot summer ahead, forecasting higher-than-normal temperatures…

7 hours ago

Delhi HC Rules In Favor Of Soldiers; Affirms Right To Disability Pension

The Delhi High Court has upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s (AFT) decision to grant disability…

7 hours ago

Delhi High Court Seeks AIIMS, Centre’s Reply On PG Admission Counseling Delay

The Delhi HC has issued a notice to Central Govt and AIIMS over the delay…

8 hours ago

Mumbai Police Visits Kunal Kamra’s Old Address Amid Legal Case Over Parody Song

Mumbai Police visited comedian Kunal Kamra’s residence in connection with a case related to his…

8 hours ago

Court Orders CBI To Unseal Three Floors In UPSC Candidates’ Death Case

The Rouse Avenue Court has ordered the CBI to remove its seal from three floors…

9 hours ago