India

Allahabad High Court Affirms Right To FIR Registration Despite Knowledge Of Facts

In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court has clarified that a magistrate cannot reject the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) simply because the complainant is already aware of the facts surrounding the case.

This decision comes as part of a judicial review of a complaint made by Mukesh Khargwar, a local elected representative from Chandauli.

Justice Manju Rani Chauhan issued this directive after scrutinizing the magistrate’s previous order, deemed to have applied judicial discretion in a mechanical manner.

The court has mandated that the magistrate issue a fresh order within one month, ensuring adherence to proper legal procedures.

Case History

The case originated when Khargwar, a member of the Papoura Development Block in Chhania, sought to voice a no-confidence motion against Arun Kumar Jaiswal, the block chief.

On 4 February 2024, he convened a meeting with fellow council members at the District Magistrate’s office to discuss this motion. However, following the meeting, he became the target of intimidation.

On 14 February 2024, Khargwar alleged that Gopal Singh, also known as Babloo, and Monu Singh arrived in his village with the intent to coerce him into signing an affidavit supporting the block chief.

When he refused, he claimed they subjected him to verbal abuse, including caste-based slurs, and physically assaulted him in an attempt to forcibly take him away.

During the altercation, Khargwar’s wife and several villagers intervened, managing to rescue him from the situation.

Following this distressing event, Khargwar approached the local police station to lodge a formal complaint, but he reported being turned away.

Undeterred, he subsequently filed an application under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which allows a complainant to request that a magistrate direct the police to register an FIR.

Instead of granting this request, the magistrate chose to initiate a complaint case, prompting Khargwar to seek judicial intervention.

The High Court’s ruling not only reinstates the complainant’s rights but also emphasizes the importance of proper legal protocols in the registration of FIRs, especially in cases involving allegations of violence and intimidation.

This judgment is likely to have broader implications for similar cases, reinforcing the legal standards that govern the actions of magistrates in India.

Also Read: Allahabad High Court Upholds Criminal Proceedings Against Key Figures In Chhattisgarh Liquor Scam

Vishal Talwar

Recent Posts

Bullet Discovery At Hyderabad Metro Sparks Police Investigation

A 9 mm bullet was found in a commuter’s bag at Hyderabad’s Moosapet Metro Station,…

2 hours ago

Neurosurgeon Reveals Everyday Habits That Gradually Harm Brain Health

Neurosurgeon Dr Richard Veyna warns that poor sleep, stress, inactivity, and sugary diets can harm…

4 hours ago

Amazon Diwali Sale: Last-Minute Smartphone Deals You Can Grab Before October 20

Amazon Diwali sale ends October 20; grab last-minute deals on Samsung, Apple, OnePlus, Realme, and…

4 hours ago

Government Extends GSTR-3B Filing Deadline By Five Days Owing To Festive Season

The government has extended the GSTR-3B filing deadline to 25 October 2025, giving taxpayers extra…

5 hours ago

Disrespectful And Insensitive: BJP Slams Akhilesh Yadav For Questioning Diwali Expenditure

The BJP on Sunday slammed Akhilesh Yadav for questioning Diwali diya spending, calling his remarks…

5 hours ago

Virat Kohli Returns To International Cricket; Claims Peak Fitness After Hiatus

Virat Kohli returns to international cricket for India’s ODI series in Australia, asserting peak fitness…

7 hours ago