India

Allahabad HC Overturns Land Sale Restrictions In Noida & Greater Noida Flood Zones

In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has provided substantial relief to farmers in Noida and Greater Noida, ruling against a District Magistrate’s order that restricted the sale of agricultural land in the flood-prone areas of the Yamuna and Hindon rivers.

The court declared the DM’s directive, which required farmers to obtain a No Objection Certificate (NOC) before selling their land, as unlawful.

Justice MC Tripathi and Justice Prashant Kumar, leading the bench, emphasized that although the right to property is not a fundamental right, Article 300A of the Constitution protects it as a constitutional right.

Any restrictions on this right must be reasonable and justifiable.

Case Background

The court’s decision invalidates the DM’s order dated 30 September 2020, the subsequent office memorandum from 1 October 2020, and the government order issued on July 8, 2024.

The ruling followed the hearing of multiple petitions, including one from Suresh Chand, a farmer from Gautam Budh Nagar.

In its judgment, the court noted that the Disaster Management Act does not grant the District Magistrate the authority to enforce a NOC requirement for the sale of agricultural land.

Moreover, the court asserted that the right to property includes the right to develop land, which the court linked to the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The High Court criticized the government’s argument that a NOC was merely a procedural requirement rather than a ban, dismissing it as incorrect.

The judges also pointed out the apparent irony of authorities allowing illegal construction in flood zones while simultaneously restricting farmers from selling their own land.

The court’s ruling underscores the importance of safeguarding property rights and calls for reasonable measures to prevent illegal construction in flood-prone areas.

However, it firmly rejected the imposition of arbitrary conditions on farmers’ rights to sell their land, labeling such restrictions as discriminatory.

This decision marks a victory for the petitioners, who had challenged the DM’s order on the grounds that it violated their constitutional rights.

The court concluded by reaffirming that any limitation on property rights must be backed by valid and justifiable reasons, ensuring that the rights of landowners are respected.

Also Read: Allahabad HC Rejects Compromise In Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Vishal Talwar

Recent Posts

Rouse Avenue Court To Hear Land-For-Jobs Scam Cases On January 16-17

The hearing was postponed as a key officer withheld permission to prosecute an alleged accused.…

11 mins ago

PM Modi Distributes Over 71,000 Appointment Letters; Highlights Youth-Centric Initiatives

On Monday, PM Modi distributed more than 71,000 appointment letters to newly recruited government employees…

31 mins ago

Man Sets Women Ablaze In NewYork Subway, Arrested

Describing the attack, New York Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch said, "As the train pulled…

32 mins ago

Bharat Express CMD Upendrra Rai To Highlight Media’s Role In Societal Empowerment

The Media Division Brahma Kumaris to commemorate the 9th death anniversary of Rajyogi Brahmakumar Omprakash…

38 mins ago

PM Modi, Leaders Pay Tribute To Chaudhary Charan Singh On Birth Anniversary

On Monday, Prime Minister Narendra Modi led the nation in honoring former Prime Minister Chaudhary…

1 hour ago

Delhi High Court To Hear BJP MLAs’ Petition On December 24

The Delhi High Court will actively hear a petition filed by Leader of Opposition Vijender…

1 hour ago