India

Petition filed in SC against new criminal laws passed by Parliament

A petition challenging the implementation of three newly introduced sets of laws aimed at reforming India’s penal codes has been filed in the Supreme Court. The petition claims these laws contain numerous “defects and discrepancies.”

Passed by the Lok Sabha on December 21, the three crucial legislations — Bhartiya Nyaya (Second) Sanhita, Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha (Second) Sanhita, and the Bhartiya Sakshya (Second) Bills — received approval from President Droupadi Murmu on December 25.

Also Read: Tsunami Warning Bells Ringing Across Japan After Earthquake Of Magnitude 7.6 Hits the Asian Nation

These new laws, intended to replace the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Indian Evidence Act, are being challenged in the petition filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari. The PIL seeks a halt in the operation of these laws, emphasizing that they were passed without proper parliamentary debate due to the suspension of numerous opposition members.

The petition urges the court to constitute an expert committee immediately to evaluate the feasibility and implications of these new criminal laws. It raises concerns that the new legislation is more stringent and could potentially lead to a police state, violating fundamental rights.

Particularly highlighted in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita are offenses related to acts of secession, armed rebellion, subversive activities, separatist movements, or actions endangering India’s sovereignty or unity, offering a revised version of the sedition law.

Also Read: 2024 to be a year of Gaganyaan readiness: ISRO Chairman

The new laws broaden the scope of punishable actions by including verbal or written expression, visual representation, electronic communication, financial means, or any other means that might incite secession, armed rebellion, subversion, or threaten India’s unity or sovereignty. Such acts can now result in imprisonment for life or up to seven years, along with a fine.

The laws introduce ‘Deshdroh’ to replace ‘Rajdroh’, essentially covering acts against the nation rather than just the ruler, as earlier referenced in IPC Section 124A concerning sedition.

Furthermore, for the first time, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita defines terrorism, an absence in the IPC, while also expanding the magistrate’s power to impose fines and the criteria for declaring an individual a proclaimed offender.

The plea raises significant concerns about the severity of these new laws, emphasizing their potential impact on fundamental rights and the increased penalties they entail, urging the Supreme Court’s intervention and scrutiny.

Naiteek Bhatt

Recent Posts

Ola Electric’s Share Hits All-Time Low Of Rs 74 Ahead Of Q2 Results

Analysts predict that the stock could drop closer to the Rs 70 mark. Ola Electric…

5 mins ago

US Election: Voting Begins With First Ballots Cast In New Hampshire

This election is one of the most divisive in US history. Harris and Trump have…

20 mins ago

Waqf Bill: Opposition MPs Meet LS Speaker, Lodge Protest Against JPC Chairman Jagdambika Pal

Opposition members alleged that Pal calls JPC meetings without consulting them and restricts their opportunity…

37 mins ago

Delhi HC Rejects Khalid Saifi’s Plea To End Attempted Murder Case In 2020 Riots

The Delhi Police opposed Saifi’s bail, citing evidence from WhatsApp messages exchanged among the accused.…

2 hours ago

Maha Kumbh 2025: Uttar Pradesh Enhances Security With Face Recognition Cameras

To protect millions of devotees at Maha Kumbh, the UP govt is implementing advanced security…

2 hours ago

SBI CME Soldierathon Set To Honour Indian Army’s Brave Soldiers On 244th Sappers Day At CME Pune

This landmark event, organized at the historic Military Institute, will honor the sacrifices of the…

2 hours ago