India

Allahabad High Court: Islam Does Not Permit Live-In Relationships If Spouse is Alive

In a recent development, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has made a significant pronouncement regarding the permissibility of live-in relationships within the context of Islamic tenets.

The bench, comprising Justice A R Masoodi and Justice A K Srivastava, asserted that followers of Islam cannot engage in live-in relationships, particularly if one’s spouse is alive.

The bench emphasized, “The Islamic tenets do not permit live-in relationships during the subsisting marriage. However, if both parties are adults and unmarried, they may choose to lead their lives in a way of their own.”

Case So Far:

This verdict came in response to a plea from Sneha Devi and Mohd Shadab Khan, residents of Bahraich district, who claimed to be in a live-in relationship.

The petitioners sought police protection after Devi’s parents filed an FIR against Khan. They accused him of kidnapping and inducing their daughter into marriage. Upon investigation, it was revealed that Khan was already married to Farida Khatoon in 2020. He even had a daughter from that marriage.

Consequently, the court refused to grant police protection to Khan based on a Supreme Court order allowing live-in relationships.

The bench cited Islamic principles, highlighting that they do not sanction such relationships, especially in cases like the present one. The court stressed the importance of balancing constitutional morality and social morality within the institution of marriage.

It warned that failing to achieve this balance could lead to a deterioration of social coherence and hinder the pursuit of peace and tranquility in society.

“The constitutional morality may come to the rescue of such a couple and the social morality settled through the customs and usages over ages may give way to the constitutional morality and protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India may step in to protect the cause. The case before us is, however, different,” the bench remarked.

As a result, the court directed the police to ensure the petitioner Sneha Devi’s safety by sending her back to her parents under security measures.

This decision underscores the complex interplay between religious beliefs, legal frameworks, and societal norms within the Indian judicial system.

Also Read: PM Modi To Conduct Roadshows In Bhubaneswar, Patna

Mankrit Kaur

Recent Posts

PM Modi Hails Bihar Mandate, Says ‘Katta Government’ Will Never Return As He Targets Congress–RJD Bloc

Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrates the NDA’s sweeping Bihar victory, criticises Congress and RJD over…

12 hours ago

Bihar Elections 2025: From Youth To Experience, Maithili Thakur And Harinarayan Singh Emerge As The Poll’s Most Striking Winners

Bihar Election 2025 highlights a striking contrast as 79-year-old Harinarayan Singh records a landmark victory…

12 hours ago

Bihar Election 2025: NDA Landslide Sparks Opposition Uproar, Congress Leaders Criticise EC

The NDA secures a massive win in Bihar with 202 seats, while Mahagathbandhan manages just…

14 hours ago

Tej Pratap Yadav Accepts Defeat; Calls It A ‘Moral Victory’ As He Attacks ‘Traitors’ And Criticises Tejashwi

Tej Pratap Yadav reacts to the Bihar election results, calling his defeat a moral win…

14 hours ago

PM Modi Hails “Governance, Development” Victory After NDA Sweeps Bihar

PM Modi hails NDA’s Bihar win, voters reward governance, development, and strong performance across the…

14 hours ago

Bihar Election 2025: NDA Sweeps Patna; Wins 11 Of 14 Seats

NDA dominates Patna, Bihar Assembly 2025, BJP wins 11 seats, Nitish Kumar, Mahagathbandhan loses.

15 hours ago