India

Allahabad High Court: Islam Does Not Permit Live-In Relationships If Spouse is Alive

In a recent development, the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has made a significant pronouncement regarding the permissibility of live-in relationships within the context of Islamic tenets.

The bench, comprising Justice A R Masoodi and Justice A K Srivastava, asserted that followers of Islam cannot engage in live-in relationships, particularly if one’s spouse is alive.

The bench emphasized, “The Islamic tenets do not permit live-in relationships during the subsisting marriage. However, if both parties are adults and unmarried, they may choose to lead their lives in a way of their own.”

Case So Far:

This verdict came in response to a plea from Sneha Devi and Mohd Shadab Khan, residents of Bahraich district, who claimed to be in a live-in relationship.

The petitioners sought police protection after Devi’s parents filed an FIR against Khan. They accused him of kidnapping and inducing their daughter into marriage. Upon investigation, it was revealed that Khan was already married to Farida Khatoon in 2020. He even had a daughter from that marriage.

Consequently, the court refused to grant police protection to Khan based on a Supreme Court order allowing live-in relationships.

The bench cited Islamic principles, highlighting that they do not sanction such relationships, especially in cases like the present one. The court stressed the importance of balancing constitutional morality and social morality within the institution of marriage.

It warned that failing to achieve this balance could lead to a deterioration of social coherence and hinder the pursuit of peace and tranquility in society.

“The constitutional morality may come to the rescue of such a couple and the social morality settled through the customs and usages over ages may give way to the constitutional morality and protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India may step in to protect the cause. The case before us is, however, different,” the bench remarked.

As a result, the court directed the police to ensure the petitioner Sneha Devi’s safety by sending her back to her parents under security measures.

This decision underscores the complex interplay between religious beliefs, legal frameworks, and societal norms within the Indian judicial system.

Also Read: PM Modi To Conduct Roadshows In Bhubaneswar, Patna

Mankrit Kaur

Recent Posts

PM Modi To Launch Rs 13,480 Crore Projects In Bihar Today; Tight Security In Wake Of J&K Attack

PM Modi will likely visit Bihar today to launch and lay foundation stones for several…

1 min ago

Pahalgam Terror Attack: India Revokes Visas Of Pakistani Citizens; Suspends Indus Water Treaty

After the Pahalgam terror attack that killed 28, India announced major diplomatic and strategic moves…

13 hours ago

Pahalgam Terror Attack: Acharya Pramod Krishnam Slams Rahul, Akhilesh, Says Hindus Were Killed After Being Asked Their Names, What Will You Say Now?

A brutal terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on Tuesday has left 28 people…

14 hours ago

PM Modi To Visit Bihar On April 24; To Launch Projects Worth ₹13,480 Crore

Prime Minister Modi will visit Bihar on April 24 to attend the National Panchayati Raj…

15 hours ago

Servotech Wins ₹15.8 Cr Rooftop Solar Order From Waltair Division, East Coast Railway

Servotech Renewable Power System Ltd (NSE: SERVOTECH) has secured a ₹15.8 crore order from the…

15 hours ago

Pahalgam Terror Attack: Encounter Breaks Out In J&K’s Kulgam District

In a swift response to threats, security forces engaged terrorists in Kulgam just hours after…

15 hours ago